linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Mathias Nyman <mathias.nyman@intel.com>
To: Yingjoe Chen <yingjoe.chen@mediatek.com>, balbi@ti.com
Cc: chunfeng.yun@mediatek.com, Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
	devicetree@vger.kernel.org, Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@pengutronix.de>,
	linux-usb@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
	linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org,
	Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@gmail.com>,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@free-electrons.com>,
	Roger Quadros <rogerq@ti.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/6] xhci: probe phy before add usb_hcd
Date: Mon, 01 Jun 2015 18:17:04 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <556C7770.70506@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1433170337.12128.18.camel@mtksdaap41>

On 01.06.2015 17:52, Yingjoe Chen wrote:
> On Wed, 2015-05-27 at 07:18 -0500, Felipe Balbi wrote:
>> On Wed, May 27, 2015 at 07:48:00PM +0800, chunfeng.yun@mediatek.com wrote:
>>> From: Chunfeng Yun <chunfeng.yun@mediatek.com>
>>>
>>> find the phy driver before add primary usb_hcd to avoid acessing
>>> xHCI register which may hangup the system when the phy is not loaded
>>> yet and the related powers or clocks put in phy driver are not
>>> enabled.
>>
>> it seems like the same clock is needed by PHY and XHCI. This patch looks
>> incorrect.
> 
> 
> Hi,
> 
> I agree that the driver should enable clock it used by itself and not
> depends on init order. This should be fixed.
> 
> But in general, I think it make sense to only add hcd after all required
> resource are ready. At least it remove unnecessary calls to
> usb_add_hcd/usb_remove_hcd. Is it better if the commit message is
> changed to something like the below?
> 
> Currently xhci_plat_probe() call usb_add_hcd before trying to init the
> phy. However if the phy is not ready at the moment, it have to remove
> the hcd and probe again later 
> 
> Change the init order so we only add hcd when all required resource are
> ready.
> 
Hi

Rogers Quadros patchseries that changes how HCDs are created and added for
xhci-plat was just sent forward. It first creates both HCDs, then adds them.

Doesn't usb_add_hcd() as it's first task take care of the PHYs? 
I'm hoping to remove that part completely from xhci-plat.c but haven't
looked into it properly yet.

-Mathias
 


  reply	other threads:[~2015-06-01 15:14 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-05-27 11:47 [PATCH 0/6] Mediatek xHCI support chunfeng.yun
2015-05-27 11:47 ` [PATCH 1/6] dt-bindings: Add usb3.0 phy binding for MT65xx SoCs chunfeng.yun
2015-05-27 11:47 ` [PATCH 2/6] dt-bindings: Add a binding for Mediatek xHCI host controller chunfeng.yun
2015-05-27 11:48 ` [PATCH 3/6] xhci: probe phy before add usb_hcd chunfeng.yun
2015-05-27 12:18   ` Felipe Balbi
2015-06-01 14:52     ` Yingjoe Chen
2015-06-01 15:17       ` Mathias Nyman [this message]
2015-06-02  4:00         ` Roger Quadros
2015-05-27 11:48 ` [PATCH 4/6] usb: phy: add usb3.0 phy driver for mt65xx SoCs chunfeng.yun
2015-06-01 16:18   ` Felipe Balbi
2015-05-27 11:48 ` [PATCH 5/6] xhci: mediatek: support MTK xHCI host controller chunfeng.yun
2015-05-27 11:48 ` [PATCH 6/6] arm64: dts: mediatek: add xHCI & usb phy for mt8173 chunfeng.yun

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=556C7770.70506@intel.com \
    --to=mathias.nyman@intel.com \
    --cc=balbi@ti.com \
    --cc=chunfeng.yun@mediatek.com \
    --cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-usb@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
    --cc=matthias.bgg@gmail.com \
    --cc=maxime.ripard@free-electrons.com \
    --cc=robh+dt@kernel.org \
    --cc=rogerq@ti.com \
    --cc=s.hauer@pengutronix.de \
    --cc=yingjoe.chen@mediatek.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).