From: Xin Hao <xhao@linux.alibaba.com>
To: sjpark@amazon.de
Cc: xhao@linux.alibaba.com, akpm@linux-foundation.org,
linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH V2 1/4] mm/damon: Unified access_check function naming rules
Date: Thu, 11 Nov 2021 14:07:01 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <556ab139a12296744d25f76b99f4e6b7ccfaf131.1636610337.git.xhao@linux.alibaba.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <cover.1636610337.git.xhao@linux.alibaba.com>
In damon/paddr.c file, two functions names start with underscore,
static void __damon_pa_prepare_access_check(struct damon_ctx *ctx,
struct damon_region *r)
static void __damon_pa_prepare_access_check(struct damon_ctx *ctx,
struct damon_region *r)
In damon/vaddr.c file, there are also two functions with the same function,
static void damon_va_prepare_access_check(struct damon_ctx *ctx,
struct mm_struct *mm, struct damon_region *r)
static void damon_va_check_access(struct damon_ctx *ctx,
struct mm_struct *mm, struct damon_region *r)
It makes sense to keep consistent, and it is not easy to be confused with
the function that call them.
Signed-off-by: Xin Hao <xhao@linux.alibaba.com>
Reviewed-by: SeongJae Park <sj@kernel.org>
---
mm/damon/vaddr.c | 8 ++++----
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/mm/damon/vaddr.c b/mm/damon/vaddr.c
index 35fe49080ee9..905e0fc8a8ec 100644
--- a/mm/damon/vaddr.c
+++ b/mm/damon/vaddr.c
@@ -409,7 +409,7 @@ static void damon_va_mkold(struct mm_struct *mm, unsigned long addr)
* Functions for the access checking of the regions
*/
-static void damon_va_prepare_access_check(struct damon_ctx *ctx,
+static void __damon_va_prepare_access_check(struct damon_ctx *ctx,
struct mm_struct *mm, struct damon_region *r)
{
r->sampling_addr = damon_rand(r->ar.start, r->ar.end);
@@ -428,7 +428,7 @@ void damon_va_prepare_access_checks(struct damon_ctx *ctx)
if (!mm)
continue;
damon_for_each_region(r, t)
- damon_va_prepare_access_check(ctx, mm, r);
+ __damon_va_prepare_access_check(ctx, mm, r);
mmput(mm);
}
}
@@ -514,7 +514,7 @@ static bool damon_va_young(struct mm_struct *mm, unsigned long addr,
* mm 'mm_struct' for the given virtual address space
* r the region to be checked
*/
-static void damon_va_check_access(struct damon_ctx *ctx,
+static void __damon_va_check_access(struct damon_ctx *ctx,
struct mm_struct *mm, struct damon_region *r)
{
static struct mm_struct *last_mm;
@@ -550,7 +550,7 @@ unsigned int damon_va_check_accesses(struct damon_ctx *ctx)
if (!mm)
continue;
damon_for_each_region(r, t) {
- damon_va_check_access(ctx, mm, r);
+ __damon_va_check_access(ctx, mm, r);
max_nr_accesses = max(r->nr_accesses, max_nr_accesses);
}
mmput(mm);
--
2.31.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-11-11 6:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-11-11 6:07 [PATCH V2 0/4] mm/damon: Do some small changes Xin Hao
2021-11-11 6:07 ` Xin Hao [this message]
2021-11-11 6:07 ` [PATCH V2 2/4] mm/damon: Add 'age' of region tracepoint support Xin Hao
2021-11-11 6:07 ` [PATCH V2 3/4] mm/damon/core: Using function abs() instead of diff_of() Xin Hao
2021-11-11 6:07 ` [PATCH V2 4/4] mm/damon: Remove some no need func definitions in damon.h file Xin Hao
2021-11-11 9:24 ` [PATCH V2 0/4] mm/damon: Do some small changes SeongJae Park
2021-11-11 15:44 ` Xin Hao
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=556ab139a12296744d25f76b99f4e6b7ccfaf131.1636610337.git.xhao@linux.alibaba.com \
--to=xhao@linux.alibaba.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=sjpark@amazon.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).