Re: [PATCH 3/3] xen/block: add multi-page ring support

From: Bob Liu <bob.liu@oracle.com>
To: "Roger Pau Monné" <roger.pau@citrix.com>
Cc: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@oracle.com>,
	Paul Durrant <Paul.Durrant@citrix.com>,
	"xen-devel@lists.xen.org" <xen-devel@lists.xen.org>,
	David Vrabel <david.vrabel@citrix.com>,
	"justing@spectralogic.com" <justing@spectralogic.com>,
	Julien Grall <julien.grall@citrix.com>,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Marcus Granado <marcus.granado@citrix.com>,
	Rafal Mielniczuk <Rafal.Mielniczuk@citrix.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] xen/block: add multi-page ring support
Date: Mon, 22 Jun 2015 09:20:04 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <558762C4.2000002@oracle.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5576F325.5050304@citrix.com>

On 06/09/2015 10:07 PM, Roger Pau Monné wrote:
> El 09/06/15 a les 15.39, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk ha escrit:
...
>> Roger, I put them (patches) on devel/for-jens-4.2 on
>>
>> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/konrad/xen.git
>>
>> I think these two patches:
>> drivers: xen-blkback: delay pending_req allocation to connect_ring
>> xen/block: add multi-page ring support
>>
>> are the only ones that haven't been Acked by you (or maybe they
>> have and I missed the Ack?)
> 
> Hello,
> 
> I was waiting to Ack those because the XenServer storage performance
> folks found out that these patches cause a performance regression on
> some of their tests. I'm adding them to the conversation so they can
> provide more details about the issues they found, and whether we should
> hold pushing this patches or not.
> 

Hey,

Are there any updates? What's the performance regression problem?

Thanks,
-Bob
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/