From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753557AbbF0KAk (ORCPT ); Sat, 27 Jun 2015 06:00:40 -0400 Received: from mout.web.de ([212.227.17.12]:63728 "EHLO mout.web.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752353AbbF0KAh (ORCPT ); Sat, 27 Jun 2015 06:00:37 -0400 Message-ID: <558E742D.2010907@users.sourceforge.net> Date: Sat, 27 Jun 2015 12:00:13 +0200 From: SF Markus Elfring User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.7.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Darren Hart CC: Julia Lawall , Anisse Astier , Corentin Chary , Ike Panhc , Jonathan Woithe , Mattia Dongili , platform-driver-x86@vger.kernel.org, acpi4asus-user@lists.sourceforge.net, LKML , kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: platform: x86: Deletion of checks before backlight_device_unregister() References: <5307CAA2.8060406@users.sourceforge.net> <5317A59D.4@users.sourceforge.net> <547389A6.9090106@users.sourceforge.net> <3842367.ojrMxTW2rH@path> <5473AD39.9010309@users.sourceforge.net> <20150626230655.GB57818@vmdeb7> In-Reply-To: <20150626230655.GB57818@vmdeb7> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:WlWNJQCcT9yCol3fBrNmCLKe98SB1YqSZIuzkHZEqPVkMBjcSLW kuDW3RaZeKwz9XtildME3FXnIv54h8sIZiGBPqIYRCeSDkiITr19Gs1oDVazlPp3ZmgSUkO 7ctbVo8ZLRETo80dDhFAkI3bam60LhHEAaceLOGjVSjbcd8qbFVXcXNm9KpU/tYByfFdyg+ ZiAzOKB2mpl+TCANjF5DA== X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V01:K0:WUlBHi5wouk=:Jbh+D9pZLIJTPXQCaz4zMI 6U7W8nbrm1br8SOykAyisqx8mf8UaEjLy1zq6LpiU/JCqTmSiznbGDtM2SZrBUrGoAJNUIgys TUAInxYsyz5W0glgcTJ/q3gI6S2wdlpnq4LG38IKHEBZ/Mk0jD9MlrSytdukwMnkiLIzGgrTN m1Gzs2J0BEj6fFUhJ573lY+jLkYf9vQorBrk5ePjtGT3ixurUkhqEMXPlKBUvj2cxc2MVJaok wff96cA5mZYu/i5OiN/XOomI5iX2OT1CfjtBzS9H8AGyfFchx7+0tS+anURJo/d7+dKhdMLn3 0cX8F0rDx8oXmqAsUI7s9CPKUpeKTBuST5EQKHMkTaZ6+rOrR25g2TqttKkivhK4oe2NWa6QS RxtXPf0bUaUODpNxXWtMOulwktE727CKq5f+pabviVUTlHaU3e8BOMr/CTrVfTTuF4wwbmMZk WwH2uuhKvPa4T1s9zgEtFIa8aG70dxcBgxsVWt00onOashaSMP2TlnWeVPRJNSlaYBGLk03jz 47s9AZb2pOUm3zQ7RIQ1xJ7/1N0Q1Vymb0sXgMEqglgIapzNXnsJ8tTn2HJkTi9+YiOLSfs/U /m/7wwsYvMtKeA8gC/L9sMMlGBrn1DPJOGWD75dQcutcHVsGHGBheAjFH7ckfDf6eK0OQ3eIc SnZoH0HPNuksvyj/bxAx2RHeJ608OrbHQdQ4UWLXzPcq9DtegNvUvCeZCoBSu+Wwwz4s= Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > Julia, do you have any particular objection to this specific patch? > I didn't see a reason to prevent it going in. Thanks for your interest around this concrete update suggestion. * Would you like to distinguish the consequences a bit more for results from the application of the semantic patch language? * Where do you prefer to store special extensions for Coccinelle's script collection Regards, Markus