From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1758041AbbGGQPv (ORCPT ); Tue, 7 Jul 2015 12:15:51 -0400 Received: from mout.web.de ([212.227.15.3]:53715 "EHLO mout.web.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753112AbbGGQPk (ORCPT ); Tue, 7 Jul 2015 12:15:40 -0400 Subject: Re: Clarification for the use of additional fields in the message body To: Frans Klaver References: <530CD2C4.4050903@users.sourceforge.net> <530CF8FF.8080600@users.sourceforge.net> <530DD06F.4090703@users.sourceforge.net> <5317A59D.4@users.sourceforge.net> <558EB32E.6090003@users.sourceforge.net> <558EB4DE.3080406@users.sourceforge.net> <20150707023103.GA22043@kroah.com> <559B6FF8.9010704@users.sourceforge.net> <559B85CD.6040200@users.sourceforge.net> <559BBDD6.7040808@users.sourceforge.net> Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman , Chris Park , Dean Lee , Johnny Kim , Rachel Kim , linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, devel@driverdev.osuosl.org, Julia Lawall , kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org, LKML From: SF Markus Elfring X-Enigmail-Draft-Status: N1110 Message-ID: <559BFB19.2080700@users.sourceforge.net> Date: Tue, 7 Jul 2015 18:15:21 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:aNxBYxSLiDQGHobNJDaAR5q1RD51HLe5iYCl44OFe2lkTgUhJV6 /IscYov9ShkEAptfZwrQHp30ToGCHhrtPWevALyKRRyyjytSn8fPvZvq+kyGSJghHUPM8lL 6mlVPCCJh9S6PmfPBvgmUrFEVtv/kHBpp20QTQPZwfxyNhE8iB9dx2UZVF+u+aKskCrL8Uy iNrfJW9242EMcWj4rKFgQ== X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V01:K0:yi0LMV0+KVc=:KARL2m8oo1rsXNVV+/p+tG cVPSzOod6LjSTiAhFodl8pziRZYQD/I4Lr5HYafJz39YaPWFYngz1ZKQlX1BZU3u3Ejy+z797 jka4wdY8qqrLscjNnIIxcmvzVZeDa2dyQ9Qp/bIcaDe11q6dm8+GTyI0lcM8wZ8yTMz32bEz+ gh3h/yORBL1kbs5qDwvni1IG4y0j4q+/sN2997VHdXONPdEs+DArfH4zpRWlQgu91EQN5u+50 X/9XsMQFKQy8btNXFLZalZeRLTuOFfq0jZ68Ax8LNgagvsZagz5/fPYdEqDWxSuvzPDarLI/h wD++b4618BHUZOST+evJ+M6wBDSmxKKt8o2ezYZNj+fYmPMYTg/v/4kiMPVFylsmomMkLZjI9 OUFuL3mU4Q0nPMHAuJq4hPSG1SeEtYCUm36E8yzjowrkFpWhlbxCRA553pExWRaeqvlw33KKb zKwH8UuhuR3xuywFEhjFDaBDIzFRigqV6nJ77i3r1//JM10O7ySaMvvl6qebG4JUoJ4sp8Qyh Yke6Yq/BaUsyNKAqIyqR7HR6JPRER/mD35cnP8VIFv1limcY+twbzHsSAbZMR6GDTtwF30ntg AFZCDVrF9jYgt1mAjZbXh/Aq4M2c4WGqeN084bpVfmZi9V2gC4LpEHZdZce/j2FtaTDvNt+DF 00n7xATzSn83Oj2ZoAbeu+yhJ9lv9EHey/lXxXOj5LVQbVtpVx8xbjqV6bbi4wIeDo3g= Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > I can't remember ever changing or explicitly preserving the commit date. > I don't think I care enough. Would any more software developers and maintainers like to share their experiences around such details? When do commit timestamps become relevant as a documentation item for contribution authorship? > Remembering the author separately from the committer is something > git does by design anyway. Do you usually just reuse a procedure from a well-known command for which a description is provided like the following? http://git-scm.com/docs/git-am '… "From: " and "Subject: " lines starting the body override the respective commit author name and title values taken from the headers. …' Will further fields be eventually mentioned there? Regards, Markus