From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id S933743AbbGHNqy (ORCPT <rfc822;w@1wt.eu>);
	Wed, 8 Jul 2015 09:46:54 -0400
Received: from mout.web.de ([212.227.17.11]:63864 "EHLO mout.web.de"
	rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
	id S933449AbbGHNqt (ORCPT <rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
	Wed, 8 Jul 2015 09:46:49 -0400
Subject: Re: Clarification for the use of additional fields in the message
 body
To: Julian Calaby <julian.calaby@gmail.com>
References: <alpine.DEB.2.10.1402251014170.2080@hadrien>
 <530DD06F.4090703@users.sourceforge.net>
 <alpine.DEB.2.02.1402262129250.2221@localhost6.localdomain6>
 <5317A59D.4@users.sourceforge.net> <558EB32E.6090003@users.sourceforge.net>
 <558EB4DE.3080406@users.sourceforge.net> <20150707023103.GA22043@kroah.com>
 <559B6FF8.9010704@users.sourceforge.net>
 <CAH6sp9Nn7LKdqT9E0bykY8jpEc-Ugxn8wby5yLcW+nsx=yG3NQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <559B85CD.6040200@users.sourceforge.net>
 <CAH6sp9Npqma18pj=ZsxYpCNDCm-AjjXvw61MGKBEKSYvg_LUBg@mail.gmail.com>
 <559BBDD6.7040808@users.sourceforge.net>
 <CAH6sp9O=NgJXOJzQaaA0o_yae+ae1oJa5Kcqmpo-WWBO_xUW+g@mail.gmail.com>
 <559BFB19.2080700@users.sourceforge.net>
 <CAGRGNgXTN8AxBNNfie4KvvErOXm3LUyL_QLLWQ6TN_wJgJkD-A@mail.gmail.com>
 <559CCC9D.8050606@users.sourceforge.net>
 <CAGRGNgWcHxwjx07A45No8vArXR12JGKcfif1Rvi30PQbJs4SGQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <559CED4C.1080402@users.sourceforge.net>
 <CAGRGNgU1SSUw-97aS0nhFObcMpLPdP3ej9WWNVwN77Fd=ws-bQ@mail.gmail.com>
Cc: Frans Klaver <fransklaver@gmail.com>,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
        Chris Park <chris.park@atmel.com>, Dean Lee <dean.lee@atmel.com>,
        Johnny Kim <johnny.kim@atmel.com>, Rachel Kim <rachel.kim@atmel.com>,
        linux-wireless <linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org>,
        "devel@driverdev.osuosl.org" <devel@driverdev.osuosl.org>,
        Julia Lawall <julia.lawall@lip6.fr>, kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org,
        LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
From: SF Markus Elfring <elfring@users.sourceforge.net>
X-Enigmail-Draft-Status: N1110
Message-ID: <559D29B9.2080408@users.sourceforge.net>
Date: Wed, 8 Jul 2015 15:46:33 +0200
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/38.0.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <CAGRGNgU1SSUw-97aS0nhFObcMpLPdP3ej9WWNVwN77Fd=ws-bQ@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:fEFR84P1AvgBgsqTazYkK9KXFJx/xIXC2T4uqT9gMmHlqQxOXlF
 VOBXcEFNjT5jT6RNVe5CLZDhQjnzMBOQrYHt0NeVZ4tN7k+F4h+BojRD6OIKZsiMCPDoWpA
 C+2vz0ja2j5nQLy1KnTcjw/BEBQujbLdR2OvnA6Dn3ZxJGfWMw0hlCv0jrF4XguutpOGJsI
 XYqyXeqBlIZVIAdKgR5HQ==
X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V01:K0:mX0NZeofXFc=:etkxRpCzzlIAfqej7jkjBX
 IpjDIrmgopZBidZXTmQmOzAIQ2jBHuj95LLIKO2+AoOZpCv3kldT+F6p3Sq9MZD2fvRRFo6wp
 WGB5td+Dv8+wemcvm8dmqL+IBAkUfWdqVFlD1W5CoZ/U0hUk+vMB7stvFkvlOZ2JYs27c099f
 2bdJIXO5Oo7eVrVV1FmOnkn0rCRONytoOlqfyMqOylkUcpKkAZQMq9nsP9i6ON6A8x9kg9iwb
 Z5Q7srtT5rd3hMQAboKQCEKUwkyOax4BhqfB5CpA/QpO2n9Zqwx6AUY0e8Z6HTjRtb/loDlmK
 0xcefKpk5EcNY0P9EkPD/f6OUY0Qpc1AillXXSNp6nXSApPnfRARJMYPmAHv1mewBMOIvfzB/
 s0uioHIPnJkxnxt5tTcFX1wZlWOa6yfHb9bLavL0krpiW96vunhDrLcEt0F+AXewvLC6bpFbf
 GZCBOB4GoKOYKULmunaiJndLxvtGDiA4PRDaRTFG3KCWOhcOWOWGHQR1goV6fTv3w/kgC6wuw
 nVo2BiHGd3fJDs9RbWWMTKG9aXloB5ejd0QWQysWUyyqeaESAvBL1//lfKNtror4MFmu4R5R1
 IgJgHsul2wzhVOQ3U62zNlc1jYdmEFJJ1ZSg501NCyTfhg/5PxAtrZS8fpFQEE0tCPcaOw4ir
 z6JmZOYAsBKpFOBLYxTRi2UJBDOCbnLzNnRSAPFVttTxTCAHarbSLIUjm1KxgtPxs3vM=
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

> Is there truly no way to simplify that process?

I see some software development possibilities which could improve
the communication with high volume mailing lists.


> You should be sending the patches directly with SMTP using git-send-email,

This tool is also fine for the publishing of a lot of patches.


> if you're not, then you're making things overly complicated for yourself.

But I prefer a graphical user interface for my mail handling so far.


> Having a feature doesn't mean that it should be used.

Does any of the "questionable functionality" get occasionally overlooked
a bit too often?

Regards,
Markus