From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id S1753405AbbGQCcF (ORCPT <rfc822;w@1wt.eu>);
	Thu, 16 Jul 2015 22:32:05 -0400
Received: from szxga01-in.huawei.com ([58.251.152.64]:57968 "EHLO
	szxga01-in.huawei.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
	with ESMTP id S1752104AbbGQCcD (ORCPT
	<rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
	Thu, 16 Jul 2015 22:32:03 -0400
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v5 0/3] Make eBPF programs output data to perf
To: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
        Alexei Starovoitov <ast@plumgrid.com>
References: <1436839171-31527-1-git-send-email-hekuang@huawei.com>
 <55A47DA5.9080808@plumgrid.com> <20150714093501.606e2113@gandalf.local.home>
CC: <masami.hiramatsu.pt@hitachi.com>, <acme@kernel.org>,
        <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>, <mingo@redhat.com>, <namhyung@kernel.org>,
        <jolsa@kernel.org>, <wangnan0@huawei.com>, <pi3orama@163.com>,
        <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
From: He Kuang <hekuang@huawei.com>
Message-ID: <55A868F3.5090007@huawei.com>
Date: Fri, 17 Jul 2015 10:31:15 +0800
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/38.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <20150714093501.606e2113@gandalf.local.home>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Originating-IP: [10.110.54.65]
X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org


On 2015/7/14 21:35, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> On Mon, 13 Jul 2015 20:10:29 -0700
> Alexei Starovoitov <ast@plumgrid.com> wrote:
>
>> On 7/13/15 6:59 PM, He Kuang wrote:
>>> This version we output bpf trace events in a hex array, the results
>>> for three u64 integers in previous sample changed to this:
>>>
>>>     dd 1042 [000] 1296.122951: bpf:bpf_output_data: 7a ca aa c6 2d 01 00
>>>     00 95 87 ec ca 2d 01 00 00 1b bd 41 04 00 00 00 00
>>
>> typo in the above. It's not 3 u64 integers, but variable number of u8.
>>
>> Whole thing looks good.
>> I've acked patch 3.
>> Hopefully Steven can review patches 1 and 2.
>
> I'll try to get around to it ;-)
>
> -- Steve
>

Awaiting your reply ;-)

Thank you.