From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753260AbbHMQv6 (ORCPT ); Thu, 13 Aug 2015 12:51:58 -0400 Received: from mail-ig0-f180.google.com ([209.85.213.180]:38100 "EHLO mail-ig0-f180.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752202AbbHMQvz (ORCPT ); Thu, 13 Aug 2015 12:51:55 -0400 Message-ID: <55CCCB2A.9020203@kernel.dk> Date: Thu, 13 Aug 2015 10:51:54 -0600 From: Jens Axboe User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.8.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Ming Lin , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org CC: Christoph Hellwig , Kent Overstreet , Dongsu Park , Mike Snitzer , "Martin K. Petersen" Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 00/11] simplify block layer based on immutable biovecs References: <1439363241-31772-1-git-send-email-mlin@kernel.org> In-Reply-To: <1439363241-31772-1-git-send-email-mlin@kernel.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 08/12/2015 01:07 AM, Ming Lin wrote: > Hi Jens, > > Neil/Mike/Martin have acked/reviewed PATCH 1. > Now it's ready. Could you please apply this series? > > https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/mlin/linux.git/log/?h=block-generic-req > > Please note that, for discard, we cap the size at 2G. > We'll change it to UINT_MAX after the splitting code in > DM thinp is rewritten. > > v6: > - rebase on top of 4.2-rc6+ > - fix discard/write_same 32bit bi_size overflow issue > - add ACKs/Review from Mike/Christoph/Martin/Steven Why did you rebase it on top of 4.2-rc6+? If you had kept it at 4.2-rc1, it would have applied to for-4.3/core a lot more easily. Care to respin on top of that? -- Jens Axboe