From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752958AbbHMRHR (ORCPT ); Thu, 13 Aug 2015 13:07:17 -0400 Received: from mail-ig0-f171.google.com ([209.85.213.171]:34090 "EHLO mail-ig0-f171.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752202AbbHMRHP (ORCPT ); Thu, 13 Aug 2015 13:07:15 -0400 Message-ID: <55CCCEC1.7090809@kernel.dk> Date: Thu, 13 Aug 2015 11:07:13 -0600 From: Jens Axboe User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.8.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Ming Lin CC: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Christoph Hellwig , Kent Overstreet , Dongsu Park , Mike Snitzer , "Martin K. Petersen" Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 00/11] simplify block layer based on immutable biovecs References: <1439363241-31772-1-git-send-email-mlin@kernel.org> <55CCCB2A.9020203@kernel.dk> <1439485401.19144.19.camel@ssi> In-Reply-To: <1439485401.19144.19.camel@ssi> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 08/13/2015 11:03 AM, Ming Lin wrote: > On Thu, 2015-08-13 at 10:51 -0600, Jens Axboe wrote: >> On 08/12/2015 01:07 AM, Ming Lin wrote: >>> Hi Jens, >>> >>> Neil/Mike/Martin have acked/reviewed PATCH 1. >>> Now it's ready. Could you please apply this series? >>> >>> https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/mlin/linux.git/log/?h=block-generic-req >>> >>> Please note that, for discard, we cap the size at 2G. >>> We'll change it to UINT_MAX after the splitting code in >>> DM thinp is rewritten. >>> >>> v6: >>> - rebase on top of 4.2-rc6+ >>> - fix discard/write_same 32bit bi_size overflow issue >>> - add ACKs/Review from Mike/Christoph/Martin/Steven >> >> Why did you rebase it on top of 4.2-rc6+? If you had kept it at 4.2-rc1, >> it would have applied to for-4.3/core a lot more easily. Care to respin >> on top of that? > > Because commit bd4aaf8 "dm: fix dm_merge_bvec regression on 32 bit > systems" in 4.2-rc6 conflicted with PATCH 6. > > Sure, I can respin on top of 4.2-rc1. > > Should I re-post new series to mail list or just update my tree? Just repost to me, if you don't want to spam the list again. -- Jens Axboe