From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id S1753666AbbIPOsN (ORCPT <rfc822;w@1wt.eu>);
	Wed, 16 Sep 2015 10:48:13 -0400
Received: from eu-smtp-delivery-143.mimecast.com ([146.101.78.143]:64872 "EHLO
	eu-smtp-delivery-143.mimecast.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK)
	by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752677AbbIPOsM convert rfc822-to-8bit
	(ORCPT <rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
	Wed, 16 Sep 2015 10:48:12 -0400
Message-ID: <55F98129.9080609@arm.com>
Date: Wed, 16 Sep 2015 15:48:09 +0100
From: "Suzuki K. Poulose" <Suzuki.Poulose@arm.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.6.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Alexander Kuleshov <kuleshovmail@gmail.com>
CC: Catalin Marinas <Catalin.Marinas@arm.com>,
        Will Deacon <Will.Deacon@arm.com>,
        "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" 
	<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
        "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] arm64/cpufeature.h: Add macros for a cpu features
 testing
References: <1441303911-9421-1-git-send-email-kuleshovmail@gmail.com> <55E987CA.4090302@arm.com> <CANCZXo4rtkVr-m3p1kyavS6Ruu7Gbwp-qqR9BhEtiZ39+NahvQ@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CANCZXo4rtkVr-m3p1kyavS6Ruu7Gbwp-qqR9BhEtiZ39+NahvQ@mail.gmail.com>
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 16 Sep 2015 14:48:09.0290 (UTC) FILETIME=[B4315AA0:01D0F08E]
X-MC-Unique: yIWXTDIlSg2fvFvpZK3uCg-1
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=WINDOWS-1252; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

On 04/09/15 13:19, Alexander Kuleshov wrote:
> 2015-09-04 18:00 GMT+06:00 Suzuki K. Poulose <Suzuki.Poulose@arm.com>:
>> There is generic CPUID feature helper queued for 4.3, which can extract
>> the feature bits
>>
>>   cpuid_feature_extract_field(feature, shift)
>>
>> You might want to use it instead. Btw, I have a patch series(waiting for
>> the merge window, before I post), which changes the way we initialise the
>> HWCAP bits.
>
> Hello,
>
> Thanks for feedback first of all. So, I'll wait while your changes will be
> in the mainline kernel and will reconsider the changes.
>

Please find the series here :

http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/2015-September/370386.html

Thanks
Suzuki