From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754501AbbJUKZ7 (ORCPT ); Wed, 21 Oct 2015 06:25:59 -0400 Received: from foss.arm.com ([217.140.101.70]:60244 "EHLO foss.arm.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754407AbbJUKZ5 (ORCPT ); Wed, 21 Oct 2015 06:25:57 -0400 Subject: Re: [PATCH 10/19] ARM: dts: at91: replace gpio-key,wakeup with wakeup-source property To: Nicolas Ferre , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org References: <1445422216-29375-1-git-send-email-sudeep.holla@arm.com> <1445422216-29375-11-git-send-email-sudeep.holla@arm.com> <5627672D.60108@atmel.com> Cc: Sudeep Holla , Alexandre Belloni , Jean-Christophe Plagniol-Villard From: Sudeep Holla Organization: ARM Message-ID: <56276832.9040006@arm.com> Date: Wed, 21 Oct 2015 11:25:54 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.3.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <5627672D.60108@atmel.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 21/10/15 11:21, Nicolas Ferre wrote: > Le 21/10/2015 12:10, Sudeep Holla a écrit : >> Though the keyboard driver for GPIO buttons(gpio-keys) will continue to >> check for/support the legacy "gpio-key,wakeup" boolean property to >> enable gpio buttons as wakeup source, "wakeup-source" is the new >> standard binding. >> >> This patch replaces the legacy "gpio-key,wakeup" with the unified >> "wakeup-source" property in order to avoid any futher copy-paste >> duplication. >> >> Cc: Nicolas Ferre > > I'm not against this if the whole series goes further. > Acked-by: Nicolas Ferre > Thanks ! > I suspect that we would need to take this patch with us on the AT91 > branches that would go to arm-soc. Is it the intentions? > Yes that was my intention for splitting the patches per SoC group. Many SoC maintainers prefer that. -- Regards, Sudeep