From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753435AbbJZIS0 (ORCPT ); Mon, 26 Oct 2015 04:18:26 -0400 Received: from e06smtp06.uk.ibm.com ([195.75.94.102]:43812 "EHLO e06smtp06.uk.ibm.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753002AbbJZISX (ORCPT ); Mon, 26 Oct 2015 04:18:23 -0400 X-IBM-Helo: d06dlp02.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com X-IBM-MailFrom: ldufour@linux.vnet.ibm.com X-IBM-RcptTo: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org;linux-next@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the akpm-current tree To: Michael Ellerman , Stephen Rothwell , Andrew Morton References: <20151021165932.3160cb59@canb.auug.org.au> <1445422133.472.1.camel@ellerman.id.au> Cc: linux-next@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, "Aneesh Kumar K.V" , Pavel Emelyanov , Benjamin Herrenschmidt , Paul Mackerras From: Laurent Dufour Message-ID: <562DE1C6.5090706@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Date: Mon, 26 Oct 2015 09:18:14 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.3.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <1445422133.472.1.camel@ellerman.id.au> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-TM-AS-MML: disable X-Content-Scanned: Fidelis XPS MAILER x-cbid: 15102608-0025-0000-0000-000004B350B0 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 21/10/2015 12:08, Michael Ellerman wrote: > On Wed, 2015-10-21 at 16:59 +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote: >> Hi Andrew, >> >> After merging the akpm-current tree, today's linux-next build (powerpc >> allnoconfig) failed like this: > >> arch/powerpc/include/asm/pgtable.h: In function 'pte_pgprot': >> arch/powerpc/include/asm/pte-common.h:104:18: error: '_PAGE_SOFT_DIRTY' undeclared (first use in this function) >> _PAGE_EXEC | _PAGE_SOFT_DIRTY) > > That's probably my fault, Andrew asked if we wanted to take it via powerpc and > I thought "yes" but never actually replied. > > Andrew can you drop this one and we'll take it via powerpc? > > It might take a while to actually hit the powerpc tree because Aneesh is doing > a lot of work in this area at the moment. > > Without knowing the code, the change logs make me think we probably also need > to take the other two from Laurent for it to make sense. Laurent? Hi Michael, Sorry for the late answer, I was off a couple of days last week. The other two patches are not specific to powerpc and, as mentioned by Aneesh, they can go to the -mm tree. Cheers, Laurent.