From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751146AbbJ3EIG (ORCPT ); Fri, 30 Oct 2015 00:08:06 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:50821 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750710AbbJ3EIC (ORCPT ); Fri, 30 Oct 2015 00:08:02 -0400 Message-ID: <5632ED1C.7050500@redhat.com> Date: Fri, 30 Oct 2015 00:07:56 -0400 From: Jon Masters Organization: Red Hat, Inc. User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.3.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Tomasz Nowicki , bhelgaas@google.com, arnd@arndb.de, will.deacon@arm.com, catalin.marinas@arm.com, rjw@rjwysocki.net, hanjun.guo@linaro.org, Lorenzo.Pieralisi@arm.com CC: jiang.liu@linux.intel.com, robert.richter@caviumnetworks.com, Narinder.Dhillon@caviumnetworks.com, ddaney@caviumnetworks.com, Liviu.Dudau@arm.com, tglx@linutronix.de, wangyijing@huawei.com, Suravee.Suthikulpanit@amd.com, msalter@redhat.com, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linaro-acpi@lists.linaro.org Subject: Re: [PATCH V1 00/11] MMCONFIG refactoring and ARM64 PCI hostbridge init based on ACPI References: <1445963922-22711-1-git-send-email-tn@semihalf.com> In-Reply-To: <1445963922-22711-1-git-send-email-tn@semihalf.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi Tomasz, Thanks for posting this series. On 10/27/2015 12:38 PM, Tomasz Nowicki wrote: > From the functionality point of view this series might be split into two logic parts: > 1. Making MMCONFIG code arch-agnostic which allows all architectures to collect > PCI config regions and used when necessary. > 2. Using generic MMCONFIG code and introducing ACPI based PCI hostbridge > initialization for ARM64 Can I confirm that the intention here is that this replaces Hanjun's previous patch series? Here's the previous one we were tracking: https://lkml.kernel.org/g/1432644564-24746-1-git-send-email-hanjun.guo@linaro.org Assuming that is the case, then we will ping a number of folks to conduct testing and provide acks (this has already been discussed in a number of conversations with semiconductors over the past few days). Thanks, Jon.