From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S966028AbbJ3I1F (ORCPT ); Fri, 30 Oct 2015 04:27:05 -0400 Received: from mail-lb0-f182.google.com ([209.85.217.182]:36180 "EHLO mail-lb0-f182.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1759225AbbJ3I06 (ORCPT ); Fri, 30 Oct 2015 04:26:58 -0400 Subject: Re: [PATCH V1 00/11] MMCONFIG refactoring and ARM64 PCI hostbridge init based on ACPI To: Jon Masters , bhelgaas@google.com, arnd@arndb.de, will.deacon@arm.com, catalin.marinas@arm.com, rjw@rjwysocki.net, hanjun.guo@linaro.org, Lorenzo.Pieralisi@arm.com References: <1445963922-22711-1-git-send-email-tn@semihalf.com> <5632ED1C.7050500@redhat.com> Cc: jiang.liu@linux.intel.com, robert.richter@caviumnetworks.com, Narinder.Dhillon@caviumnetworks.com, ddaney@caviumnetworks.com, Liviu.Dudau@arm.com, tglx@linutronix.de, wangyijing@huawei.com, Suravee.Suthikulpanit@amd.com, msalter@redhat.com, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linaro-acpi@lists.linaro.org From: Tomasz Nowicki Message-ID: <563329CD.6060506@semihalf.com> Date: Fri, 30 Oct 2015 09:26:53 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.2.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <5632ED1C.7050500@redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 10/30/2015 05:07 AM, Jon Masters wrote: > Hi Tomasz, > > Thanks for posting this series. > > On 10/27/2015 12:38 PM, Tomasz Nowicki wrote: > >> From the functionality point of view this series might be split into two logic parts: >> 1. Making MMCONFIG code arch-agnostic which allows all architectures to collect >> PCI config regions and used when necessary. >> 2. Using generic MMCONFIG code and introducing ACPI based PCI hostbridge >> initialization for ARM64 > Can I confirm that the intention here is that this replaces Hanjun's > previous patch series? Here's the previous one we were tracking: > > https://lkml.kernel.org/g/1432644564-24746-1-git-send-email-hanjun.guo@linaro.org Indeed, we can call it next version. > > Assuming that is the case, then we will ping a number of folks to > conduct testing and provide acks (this has already been discussed in a > number of conversations with semiconductors over the past few days). Yes, please, thanks! Tomasz