From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1033068AbbKEIvx (ORCPT ); Thu, 5 Nov 2015 03:51:53 -0500 Received: from mailout4.w1.samsung.com ([210.118.77.14]:47713 "EHLO mailout4.w1.samsung.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1032974AbbKEIvn (ORCPT ); Thu, 5 Nov 2015 03:51:43 -0500 X-AuditID: cbfec7f4-f79c56d0000012ee-1c-563b189d46e5 Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 0/4] Exynos SROMc configuration and Ethernet support for SMDK5410 To: Pavel Fedin , devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org References: <5639B588.1080901@samsung.com> <000b01d1179f$ed5032b0$c7f09810$@samsung.com> <563B0E4D.6020808@samsung.com> <001a01d117a6$3aed1140$b0c733c0$@samsung.com> Cc: "'Rob Herring'" , "'Pawel Moll'" , "'Mark Rutland'" , "'Ian Campbell'" , "'Kumar Gala'" , "'Kukjin Kim'" From: Krzysztof Kozlowski Message-id: <563B189D.4080907@samsung.com> Date: Thu, 05 Nov 2015 17:51:41 +0900 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.3.0 MIME-version: 1.0 In-reply-to: <001a01d117a6$3aed1140$b0c733c0$@samsung.com> Content-type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit X-Brightmail-Tracker: H4sIAAAAAAAAA+NgFvrHLMWRmVeSWpSXmKPExsVy+t/xK7pzJazDDG4eYrOYf+Qcq0X/m4Ws FuderWS0eP3C0KL/8Wtmi02Pr7FaXN41h81ixvl9TBZLr19ksnh1aRWbxYTpa1ksWvceYXfg 8Vgzbw2jx+W+XiaPlcu/sHlsWtXJ5rF5Sb1H35ZVjB6fN8kFsEdx2aSk5mSWpRbp2yVwZUz7 08dYsJKv4u6ZH8wNjGe5uxg5OSQETCQW/NnCCGGLSVy4t56ti5GLQ0hgKaPElXN7mSCcL4wS O24sYAOpEhaIkmhueQ5WJSKwhlFi+bmDjBBVVxgl/q55zAriMAu8YZQ4tewxM0gLm4CxxObl S8DaeQW0JO69ageLswioSqxeMZ8dxBYViJCYOKGBFaJGUOLH5HssIDangJXE5Gsngeo5gIbq Sdy/qAUSZhaQl9i85i3zBEaBWUg6ZiFUzUJStYCReRWjaGppckFxUnquoV5xYm5xaV66XnJ+ 7iZGSKx82cG4+JjVIUYBDkYlHl6DaqswIdbEsuLK3EOMEhzMSiK8xd+BQrwpiZVVqUX58UWl OanFhxilOViUxHnn7nofIiSQnliSmp2aWpBaBJNl4uCUamAU6Hm1zaVwkdKXG3Z+KdoC21UZ tjlfsPC8qnI1fEnSybk+E/aH8sSeWDgp+0/T6eWrP+qfLtgz856uIMtD3+saJ/dN89k8KU6q UXPPE5sv3r/0FJK41C6fvVHZzyDKfjL3u1wGu/Th1WxFfhbZ0TbyBqslVrzq3j2Fwzh8/82J MtNv/jj+5vRuJZbijERDLeai4kQArDA/ppECAAA= Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 05.11.2015 17:44, Pavel Fedin wrote: > Hello! > >>>>> This patchset also depends on Exynos 5410 pinctrl support, introduced by >>>>> patches 0003 and 0004 from this set: >>>>> [PATCH v4 0/5] ARM: EXYNOS: ODROID-XU DT and LEDs >>>>> http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/2015-March/330862.html >>>> >>>> Only the first patch made up to kernel. The rest (2-5) received feedback >>>> and I am waiting for fixing it. Andreas apparently loose the interest... >>> >>> I have rechecked the original thread on archives and found nothing new. Where can >>> i read those feedbacks? Perhaps it makes sense for me to pick them up and include >>> into my set. >> >> Go ahead. The only waiting feedback is at patch 2/5: >> >> http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/2015-March/330910.html >> Javier's pointed use of linux,stdout-path and putting xxti in >> exynos5410.dtsi (and customizing it per board if needed). >> >> Patches already got reviews and acks so only 2/5 is the stopper. > > Ah, it's odroidXU device tree. Sorry, i don't have this particular board, and my patch actually doesn't need it. I could do some > blind modifications, but cannot test them, and this is out of my scope at all. > As mentioned in the commit msg, i need only 0003 and 0004 from there. Can they be picked up independently? They don't need 0002 by > themselves, only 0005 needs it. Indeed the order of patches is messed up and this makes the confusion. I was waiting for resend of entire patchset but you are right - this is not required. 3 and 4 can be applied independently. If they apply, I will pick up them after merge window. If they don't, they will need rebasing by someone. Maybe you can take care of them? You have the SMDK5410 for testing, right? Best regards, Krzysztof