linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Guru Das Srinagesh <gurus@codeaurora.org>
To: linux-pwm@vger.kernel.org
Cc: "Thierry Reding" <thierry.reding@gmail.com>,
	"Uwe Kleine-König" <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>,
	"Subbaraman Narayanamurthy" <subbaram@codeaurora.org>,
	"David Collins" <collinsd@codeaurora.org>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	"Guru Das Srinagesh" <gurus@codeaurora.org>,
	"Shawn Guo" <shawnguo@kernel.org>,
	"Sascha Hauer" <s.hauer@pengutronix.de>,
	"Pengutronix Kernel Team" <kernel@pengutronix.de>,
	"Fabio Estevam" <festevam@gmail.com>,
	"NXP Linux Team" <linux-imx@nxp.com>,
	"Dan Carpenter" <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>
Subject: [PATCH v12 06/11] pwm: imx27: Use 64-bit division macro and function
Date: Wed,  8 Apr 2020 23:52:35 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <5649cd869599603167fc6aa7f0be20a0e31faa47.1586414867.git.gurus@codeaurora.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <cover.1586414867.git.gurus@codeaurora.org>
In-Reply-To: <cover.1586414867.git.gurus@codeaurora.org>

Since the PWM framework is switching struct pwm_state.period's
datatype to u64, prepare for this transition by using
DIV_ROUND_UP_ULL to handle a 64-bit dividend, and div64_u64 to handle a
64-bit divisor.

Also handle a possible overflow in the calculation of period_cycles when
both clk_rate and period are large numbers. This logic was unit-tested
out by calculating period_cycles using both the existing logic and the
proposed one, and the results are as below.

----------------------------------------------------------------------------
 clk_rate            period           existing            proposed
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
1000000000   18446744073709551615    18446744072    18446744073000000000
                   (U64_MAX)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
1000000000        4294967291         4294967291         4294967291
----------------------------------------------------------------------------

Overflow occurs in the first case with the existing logic, whereas the
proposed logic handles it better, sacrificing some precision in a best-effort
attempt to handle overflow. As for the second case where there are
more typical values of period, the proposed logic handles that correctly
too.

Cc: Shawn Guo <shawnguo@kernel.org>
Cc: Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@pengutronix.de>
Cc: Pengutronix Kernel Team <kernel@pengutronix.de>
Cc: Fabio Estevam <festevam@gmail.com>
Cc: NXP Linux Team <linux-imx@nxp.com>
Cc: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>
Cc: David Collins <collinsd@codeaurora.org>

Signed-off-by: Guru Das Srinagesh <gurus@codeaurora.org>
---
 drivers/pwm/pwm-imx27.c | 53 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------
 1 file changed, 45 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/pwm/pwm-imx27.c b/drivers/pwm/pwm-imx27.c
index a6e40d4..164cb65 100644
--- a/drivers/pwm/pwm-imx27.c
+++ b/drivers/pwm/pwm-imx27.c
@@ -203,7 +203,7 @@ static void pwm_imx27_wait_fifo_slot(struct pwm_chip *chip,
 	sr = readl(imx->mmio_base + MX3_PWMSR);
 	fifoav = FIELD_GET(MX3_PWMSR_FIFOAV, sr);
 	if (fifoav == MX3_PWMSR_FIFOAV_4WORDS) {
-		period_ms = DIV_ROUND_UP(pwm_get_period(pwm),
+		period_ms = DIV_ROUND_UP_ULL(pwm_get_period(pwm),
 					 NSEC_PER_MSEC);
 		msleep(period_ms);
 
@@ -213,6 +213,45 @@ static void pwm_imx27_wait_fifo_slot(struct pwm_chip *chip,
 	}
 }
 
+static int pwm_imx27_calc_period_cycles(const struct pwm_state *state,
+					unsigned long clk_rate,
+					unsigned long *period_cycles)
+{
+	u64 c = 0, c1, c2;
+
+	c1 = clk_rate;
+	c2 = state->period;
+	if (c2 > c1) {
+		c2 = c1;
+		c1 = state->period;
+	}
+
+	if (!c1 || !c2) {
+		pr_err("clk rate and period should be nonzero\n");
+		return -EINVAL;
+	}
+
+	if (c2 <= div64_u64(U64_MAX, c1)) {
+		c = c1 * c2;
+		do_div(c, 1000000000);
+	} else if (c2 <= div64_u64(U64_MAX, div64_u64(c1, 1000))) {
+		do_div(c1, 1000);
+		c = c1 * c2;
+		do_div(c, 1000000);
+	} else if (c2 <= div64_u64(U64_MAX, div64_u64(c1, 1000000))) {
+		do_div(c1, 1000000);
+		c = c1 * c2;
+		do_div(c, 1000);
+	} else if (c2 <= div64_u64(U64_MAX, div64_u64(c1, 1000000000))) {
+		do_div(c1, 1000000000);
+		c = c1 * c2;
+	}
+
+	*period_cycles = c;
+
+	return 0;
+}
+
 static int pwm_imx27_apply(struct pwm_chip *chip, struct pwm_device *pwm,
 			   const struct pwm_state *state)
 {
@@ -225,18 +264,16 @@ static int pwm_imx27_apply(struct pwm_chip *chip, struct pwm_device *pwm,
 
 	pwm_get_state(pwm, &cstate);
 
-	c = clk_get_rate(imx->clk_per);
-	c *= state->period;
-
-	do_div(c, 1000000000);
-	period_cycles = c;
+	ret = pwm_imx27_calc_period_cycles(state, clk_get_rate(imx->clk_per),
+					   &period_cycles);
+	if (ret)
+		return ret;
 
 	prescale = period_cycles / 0x10000 + 1;
 
 	period_cycles /= prescale;
 	c = (unsigned long long)period_cycles * state->duty_cycle;
-	do_div(c, state->period);
-	duty_cycles = c;
+	duty_cycles = div64_u64(c, state->period);
 
 	/*
 	 * according to imx pwm RM, the real period value should be PERIOD
-- 
The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum,
a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project


  parent reply	other threads:[~2020-04-09  6:53 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-04-09  6:52 [PATCH v12 00/11] Convert PWM period and duty cycle to u64 Guru Das Srinagesh
2020-04-09  6:52 ` [PATCH v12 01/11] drm/i915: Use 64-bit division macro Guru Das Srinagesh
2020-04-09  6:52 ` [PATCH v12 02/11] hwmon: pwm-fan: " Guru Das Srinagesh
2020-04-09  6:52 ` [PATCH v12 03/11] ir-rx51: " Guru Das Srinagesh
2020-04-09  6:52 ` [PATCH v12 04/11] pwm: clps711x: Cast period to u32 before use as divisor Guru Das Srinagesh
2020-04-09  6:52 ` [PATCH v12 05/11] pwm: pwm-imx-tpm: Use 64-bit division macro Guru Das Srinagesh
2020-04-09  6:52 ` Guru Das Srinagesh [this message]
2020-04-10 19:16   ` [PATCH v12 06/11] pwm: imx27: Use 64-bit division macro and function Guru Das Srinagesh
2020-04-09  6:52 ` [PATCH v12 07/11] pwm: sifive: Use 64-bit division macro Guru Das Srinagesh
2020-04-09  6:52 ` [PATCH v12 08/11] pwm: sun4i: Use nsecs_to_jiffies to avoid a division Guru Das Srinagesh
2020-04-10 19:20   ` Guru Das Srinagesh
2020-04-11  5:49   ` Chen-Yu Tsai
2020-04-09  6:52 ` [PATCH v12 09/11] backlight: pwm_bl: Use 64-bit division function Guru Das Srinagesh
2020-04-16  9:44   ` Lee Jones
2020-04-16 17:55     ` Guru Das Srinagesh
2020-04-09  6:52 ` [PATCH v12 10/11] clk: pwm: " Guru Das Srinagesh
2020-04-10 19:15   ` Guru Das Srinagesh
2020-04-09  6:52 ` [PATCH v12 11/11] pwm: core: Convert period and duty cycle to u64 Guru Das Srinagesh

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=5649cd869599603167fc6aa7f0be20a0e31faa47.1586414867.git.gurus@codeaurora.org \
    --to=gurus@codeaurora.org \
    --cc=collinsd@codeaurora.org \
    --cc=dan.carpenter@oracle.com \
    --cc=festevam@gmail.com \
    --cc=kernel@pengutronix.de \
    --cc=linux-imx@nxp.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pwm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=s.hauer@pengutronix.de \
    --cc=shawnguo@kernel.org \
    --cc=subbaram@codeaurora.org \
    --cc=thierry.reding@gmail.com \
    --cc=u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).