linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@redhat.com>,
	x86@kernel.org, Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
	Jiang Liu <jiang.liu@linux.intel.com>,
	"K. Y. Srinivasan" <kys@microsoft.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, xen-devel <xen-devel@lists.xen.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] x86/irq: Probe for PIC presence before allocating descs for legacy IRQs
Date: Mon, 16 Nov 2015 16:46:26 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <564A4EB2.6050401@oracle.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.2.11.1511162229520.3761@nanos>

On 11/16/2015 04:39 PM, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> On Mon, 16 Nov 2015, Boris Ostrovsky wrote:
>> Xen expects legacy interrupts to be there (pretty much for the same reason as
>> Hyper-V does) and with this change arch_probe_nr_irqs() returns zero and no
>> descriptors are allocated.
> Right, because everything which has a PIT gets them and everything
> which does not have a PIT does not.
>
>> We can allocate those descriptors as needed in xen_irq_init() (if we know that
>> IRQs are legacy), although that would look somewhat ugly and out of place.
> Why preallocating them in xen_irq_init()? You simply can remove the
> NR_IRQS_LEGACY checks in xen_allocate_irq_gsi/xen_free_irq(), right?

Of course. Thanks.

-boris

      reply	other threads:[~2015-11-16 21:46 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-11-03  9:40 [PATCH v2] x86/irq: Probe for PIC presence before allocating descs for legacy IRQs Vitaly Kuznetsov
2015-11-04 10:52 ` [tip:x86/urgent] " tip-bot for Vitaly Kuznetsov
2015-11-07  9:43 ` tip-bot for Vitaly Kuznetsov
2015-11-16 21:00 ` [PATCH v2] " Boris Ostrovsky
2015-11-16 21:39   ` Thomas Gleixner
2015-11-16 21:46     ` Boris Ostrovsky [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=564A4EB2.6050401@oracle.com \
    --to=boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=jiang.liu@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=kys@microsoft.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=vkuznets@redhat.com \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    --cc=xen-devel@lists.xen.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).