From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755365AbbLGJAE (ORCPT ); Mon, 7 Dec 2015 04:00:04 -0500 Received: from smtp.codeaurora.org ([198.145.29.96]:52207 "EHLO smtp.codeaurora.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754901AbbLGI75 (ORCPT ); Mon, 7 Dec 2015 03:59:57 -0500 Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/5] drm/dsi: Try to match non-DT dsi devices To: Jani Nikula , dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, daniel@ffwll.ch References: <201511302050.evPZc1zs%fengguang.wu@intel.com> <56651937.1080405@codeaurora.org> <87a8pmzly4.fsf@intel.com> Cc: a.hajda@samsung.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, airlied@linux.ie, treding@nvidia.com, l.stach@pengutronix.de, robh@kernel.org, linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org From: Archit Taneja Message-ID: <56654A86.1060602@codeaurora.org> Date: Mon, 7 Dec 2015 14:29:50 +0530 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.2.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <87a8pmzly4.fsf@intel.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 12/07/2015 02:15 PM, Jani Nikula wrote: > On Mon, 07 Dec 2015, Archit Taneja wrote: >> Hi, >> >> On 11/30/2015 06:15 PM, kbuild test robot wrote: >>> Hi Archit, >>> >>> [auto build test ERROR on: v4.4-rc3] >>> [also build test ERROR on: next-20151127] >>> >>> url: https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commits/Archit-Taneja/drm-dsi-DSI-for-devices-with-different-control-bus/20151130-200725 >>> config: x86_64-allyesdebian (attached as .config) >>> reproduce: >>> # save the attached .config to linux build tree >>> make ARCH=x86_64 >>> >>> All errors (new ones prefixed by >>): >>> >>> drivers/gpu/drm/drm_mipi_dsi.c: In function 'of_mipi_dsi_device_add': >>>>> drivers/gpu/drm/drm_mipi_dsi.c:168:6: error: implicit declaration of function 'of_modalias_node' [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration] >>> if (of_modalias_node(node, info.type, sizeof(info.type)) < 0) { >> >> Any suggestions on how to fix this? Is it ok to make DRM_MIPI_DSI >> depend on CONFIG_OF? > > Please don't. Just curious, how did x86 use DSI if the only way to create DSI devices until now was via DT? Archit > > BR, > Jani. > -- The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum, hosted by The Linux Foundation