From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <k.kozlowski@samsung.com>
To: Pankaj Dubey <pankaj.dubey@samsung.com>,
linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org
Cc: kgene.kim@samsung.com, thomas.ab@samsung.com,
amitdanielk@gmail.com, olof@lixom.net, khilman@linaro.org,
arnd@arndb.de
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 0/6] samsung: pmu: split up SoC specific PMU data
Date: Fri, 18 Dec 2015 13:27:37 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <56738B39.10201@samsung.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1450409536-30463-1-git-send-email-pankaj.dubey@samsung.com>
On 18.12.2015 12:32, Pankaj Dubey wrote:
> In this series I am splitting up SoC specific PMU configuration data into
> mach-exynos folder itself, before moving all of them under
> drivers/soc/samsung/. Also instead of making all changes in single patch it
> has been broken into SoC specific patches to avoid large size of patch.
> With this approach there will not be unwanted big churns just after
> adding exynos-pmu under drivers/soc/samsung.
>
> All these patches are just refactoring to keep minimal changes while moving
> exynos-pmu driver under drivers/soc/samsung/. Support for exynos7 PMU can
> be added on top of it, in such a manner that for ARM64 build, ARM related
> SoC's PMU will not get compiled and thus unnecessary increasing kernel image size.
>
> This series have been prepared on top of Krzysztof Kozlowski's
> next/stuff-late-not-split-per-branch branch, and it's just a rebase compared to
> V6 posted and reviewed here [1].
>
> [1]: https://lkml.org/lkml/2015/11/17/15
>
> For testing entire patchset on Peach-Pi (Exynos5880) based chromebook for boot
> and S2R functionality.
>
> Tested-by: Pankaj Dubey <pankaj.dubey@samsung.com>
>
> For testing entire patchset on on Trats2 (Exynos4412, S2R, reboot, poweroff)
> and Odroid XU3 (Exynos5422, reboot, poweroff).
>
> Tested-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <k.kozlowski@samsung.com>
>
> Changes since v6:
> - Rebasing on top of branch provided by Krzysztof, after resolving conflicts
> caused due to Alim's patches for adoptation of generic syscon for poweroff, reboot.
> - Included Tested-by tags on individual patches as per applicability.
> - Dropped patches v6 [1/9], v6 [2/9] as these are already present in above mentioned branch.
> - Dropped patch v6 [8/9] as after Alim's patch this patch no more required.
>
Patchset applied cleanly with:
1. Removal of blank lines at end of two files (they appeared in v7).
2. Removal of your tested-by. The author does not provide such tag
because it is assumed that he tested it before sending. However I left
the information about testing platform near your signed-off-by.
You can find the patches on the same branch:
https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/krzk/linux.git/log/?h=next/stuff-late-not-split-per-branch
I hope I will be able to push it out to arm-soc soon...
Best regards,
Krzysztof
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-12-18 4:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-12-18 3:32 [PATCH v7 0/6] samsung: pmu: split up SoC specific PMU data Pankaj Dubey
2015-12-18 3:32 ` [PATCH v7 1/6] ARM: EXYNOS: Move pmu specific headers under "linux/soc/samsung" Pankaj Dubey
2015-12-18 3:32 ` [PATCH v7 2/6] ARM: EXYNOS: split up exynos3250 SoC specific PMU data Pankaj Dubey
2015-12-18 3:32 ` [PATCH v7 3/6] ARM: EXYNOS: split up exynos4 " Pankaj Dubey
2015-12-18 3:32 ` [PATCH v7 4/6] ARM: EXYNOS: split up exynos5250 " Pankaj Dubey
2015-12-18 3:32 ` [PATCH v7 5/6] ARM: EXYNOS: split up exynos5420 " Pankaj Dubey
2015-12-18 3:32 ` [PATCH v7 6/6] drivers: soc: Add support for Exynos PMU driver Pankaj Dubey
2015-12-18 4:27 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski [this message]
2015-12-18 8:19 ` [PATCH v7 0/6] samsung: pmu: split up SoC specific PMU data pankaj.dubey
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=56738B39.10201@samsung.com \
--to=k.kozlowski@samsung.com \
--cc=amitdanielk@gmail.com \
--cc=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=kgene.kim@samsung.com \
--cc=khilman@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=olof@lixom.net \
--cc=pankaj.dubey@samsung.com \
--cc=thomas.ab@samsung.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).