On 12/19/2015 1:19 PM, Måns Rullgård wrote: > Julian Margetson writes: > >> On 12/19/2015 1:05 PM, Måns Rullgård wrote: >>> Andy Shevchenko writes: >>> >>>> On Sat, Dec 19, 2015 at 5:40 PM, Måns Rullgård wrote: >>>> >>>>> OK, I've found something. The dma setup errors are benign, caused by >>>>> the driver calling dmaengine_prep_slave_sg() even for non-dma >>>>> operations. >>>> I suppose the following is a quick fix to avoid preparing descriptor >>>> for non-DMA operations (not tested anyhow) >>>> >>>> a/drivers/ata/sata_dwc_460ex.c >>>> +++ b/drivers/ata/sata_dwc_460ex.c >>>> @@ -1041,6 +1041,9 @@ static void sata_dwc_qc_prep_by_tag(struct >>>> ata_queued_cmd *qc, u8 tag) >>>> __func__, ap->port_no, get_dma_dir_descript(qc->dma_dir), >>>> qc->n_elem); >>>> >>>> + if (!is_slave_direction(qc->dma_dir)) >>>> + return; >>>> + >>>> desc = dma_dwc_xfer_setup(qc); >>>> if (!desc) { >>>> dev_err(ap->dev, "%s: dma_dwc_xfer_setup returns NULL\n", >>> I already have a better patch sitting here. >>> >>>>> The real error is the lock recursion that's reported >>>>> later. I wasn't seeing it since I was running a UP non-preempt kernel. >>>>> With lock debugging enabled, I get the same error. This patch should >>>>> fix it. >>>>> - spin_lock_irqsave(&ap->host->lock, flags); >>>>> hsdevp->cmd_issued[tag] = cmd_issued; >>>>> - spin_unlock_irqrestore(&ap->host->lock, flags); >>>>> + >>>> This will create a second empty line, though I don't care it is so minor. >>> The patch leaves one blank line before the following block comment. I >>> think it looks better that way. >>> >> Still can't get the patch applied . > Sorry, didn't realise it conflicted with an intervening patch I had in > my tree. Try this one. >