From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id S1753394AbcADKGD (ORCPT <rfc822;w@1wt.eu>);
	Mon, 4 Jan 2016 05:06:03 -0500
Received: from mail-wm0-f51.google.com ([74.125.82.51]:37036 "EHLO
	mail-wm0-f51.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
	with ESMTP id S1752658AbcADKF7 (ORCPT
	<rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
	Mon, 4 Jan 2016 05:05:59 -0500
Subject: Re: net-libertas: Better exception handling in
 if_spi_host_to_card_worker()
To: =?UTF-8?B?UmFmYcWCIE1pxYJlY2tp?= <zajec5@gmail.com>
References: <566ABCD9.1060404@users.sourceforge.net>
 <5686F0B2.5000000@users.sourceforge.net>
 <56870866.7020000@cogentembedded.com>
 <568785B3.5000905@users.sourceforge.net>
 <alpine.DEB.2.02.1601020914100.2063@localhost6.localdomain6>
 <5687939E.7010701@users.sourceforge.net> <5687A2C7.3000704@gmail.com>
 <5687B2BC.8090901@users.sourceforge.net> <5688EBAC.5000701@gmail.com>
 <CACna6rzoJLRuTTDi3JjXg1roDbk3HXcBhhe0iOUH9xRaGU5p7A@mail.gmail.com>
Cc: SF Markus Elfring <elfring@users.sourceforge.net>,
        Julia Lawall <julia.lawall@lip6.fr>,
        Sergei Shtylyov <sergei.shtylyov@cogentembedded.com>,
        libertas-dev@lists.infradead.org,
        "linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org" <linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org>,
        Network Development <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
        Kalle Valo <kvalo@codeaurora.org>, LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org
From: Arend van Spriel <aspriel@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <568A4403.8020701@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 4 Jan 2016 11:05:55 +0100
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/38.3.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <CACna6rzoJLRuTTDi3JjXg1roDbk3HXcBhhe0iOUH9xRaGU5p7A@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org



On 03-01-16 16:18, Rafał Miłecki wrote:
> On 3 January 2016 at 10:36, Arend van Spriel <aspriel@gmail.com> wrote:
>> On 02-01-16 12:21, SF Markus Elfring wrote:
>>>> Did you look at the resulting assembly code for different target architectures?
>>>
>>> Not yet. - Which execution system variants would you recommend for
>>> further comparisons?
>>
>> Guess x86{,_64} and arm would be good candidates, ie. CISC vs. RISC.
> 
> Oh, don't forget about MIPS with its fancy branches handling. You know
> about it, don't you?

You are asking me, right ;-) ? I have come across my share of MIPS
platforms here at Broadcom, but I still try to avoid them as much as
possible.

> I'm against this patch as well.

and counting... :-p

Regards,
Arend