From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751735AbcAEIaV (ORCPT ); Tue, 5 Jan 2016 03:30:21 -0500 Received: from mout.web.de ([212.227.17.11]:60771 "EHLO mout.web.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751221AbcAEIaR (ORCPT ); Tue, 5 Jan 2016 03:30:17 -0500 Subject: Re: rsi: Delete unnecessary variable initialisations in rsi_send_mgmt_pkt() To: Julian Calaby References: <566ABCD9.1060404@users.sourceforge.net> <5687E169.4070704@users.sourceforge.net> <5687E203.1070404@users.sourceforge.net> <20160104092857.GD5284@mwanda> <568A4CFF.8060600@users.sourceforge.net> <20160104114849.GH5284@mwanda> <568A668D.8090007@users.sourceforge.net> Cc: Dan Carpenter , linux-wireless , netdev , Kalle Valo , LKML , kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org, Julia Lawall From: SF Markus Elfring X-Enigmail-Draft-Status: N1110 Message-ID: <568B7F06.1010500@users.sourceforge.net> Date: Tue, 5 Jan 2016 09:29:58 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.4.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:9e3SsqmKGNNdwXeFY9pY7wdv+E4XbfoLPmvu7whUkq48xyrPd8Y NuuSCx/wFuzjbpghyGj7SsslzilrhQqSBmPmuy6dGy9HRU7/lKsKhOOym4qQ0YnlQ8TLkVr YDtKCbMohQI73JuA6ywHrOoiNvpwo3rkhm1yf+SvrPOOUDiR7UXmQzR2dq1lTJwee/7m5c3 1z1tqnyViF0FCLKTBLyLw== X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V01:K0:JHn1lTn93qU=:v2o3Xq7od5onudIqtTQ5Nw CVcYElE1tfE72/XNjcnBErwDePA5kZAUe6u16nYsuI0V3F4sUxRV/j0x8YkDuw83HJrhC3zIc 0azyl9oFr//nxCDcZ96IqnjeZxD2PuBkC3MRaodxiaNr9qDSyqFYw8vr01mhn+CFk+oTW9Ezb 5rqJ1vae1nXBiRf/jRpDTA0NIcsnrxRwHJpzMCpk7OG/GshgYWPIn9nQWesRFVRObkqv42NtW PJ1YCx86r2CB9wyOyrHBIAouX+ijaXM3DmB/2I9k/ijK33t3FQ6kemvuPKppojO64pgqvG1TA JTS/2HDchej22AV37C22mwL6eRZ7MA+1e0uVPpYPHPgwWGg3/GIR3Hf3CWStEXKNYEwn3hvAm iKhEKaZHoBbtLzwiijfpgOguwYFakL7GO84PxBUoUqS1RUEr1i2rZN6w8aJHQtTAL/wWQwFYq Jrpr2oNxd1kv0kq7ADl8JEPu88x88FtSr4Aq1dFURWWLQAlKl6xZqpOUnp9bppoSmhPPZ7FkP ftiZjhL/c67BJr84NLEJknewVKKsTFYpnP71dFXcUecZ35tWsJBvoGv1sGCqSz1aaFAfKROqW Lcc7a+THpEaT0Jov+8kyKfhUji1QUj4SBFoGTsV6p1fwtNl0ByDm7olU6a61+pn5Jwk09WNkN AoT/FXtg5CLzcLnZEpVgN10e7ekQ0gtHJgfGgQwTKXCgb7ZowmflYIC+L911TCqMaOibvIpPR WxR6aiqN2U7077wTX5gq3ybIv6jUpfl8MJVB71x5UhOeixRvHZMc4UgDNjAndQK/kxBgf6XTb JpXcaU2 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > That said, if you figure out some change that produces significant > reductions in code or binary size on multiple architectures without > making things more complicated, less readable or making the code or > binary size larger, then by all means propose it. Are you looking also for "a proof" that such changes are worthwhile? > "This makes things smaller" carries much more weight than > "I think this is better". Can the discussed implementation of a function like "rsi_send_mgmt_pkt" become a bit smaller by the deletion of extra variable initialisations > Almost all of the changes you've proposed that have seen any > discussion whatsoever fall into the latter category. Thanks for your interesting feedback. Can a further constructive dialogue evolve from the presented information? Regards, Markus