From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S933301AbcAKR5S (ORCPT ); Mon, 11 Jan 2016 12:57:18 -0500 Received: from mail-pa0-f52.google.com ([209.85.220.52]:34400 "EHLO mail-pa0-f52.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1758842AbcAKR5P (ORCPT ); Mon, 11 Jan 2016 12:57:15 -0500 Subject: Re: [PATCH] serial: Remove 68328 driver To: Greg Ungerer , One Thousand Gnomes , Geert Uytterhoeven References: <1449830170-15096-1-git-send-email-frederik.voelkel@fau.de> <1450438103-1059-1-git-send-email-frederik.voelkel@fau.de> <5689FD36.4020609@westnet.com.au> <20160104103031.655b6f61@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk> <568A530F.8020807@uclinux.org> Cc: Linux/m68k , =?UTF-8?Q?Frederik_V=c3=b6lkel?= , Jiri Slaby , Greg KH , "linux-serial@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , linux-kernel@i4.cs.fau.de, Lukas Braun , uClinux development list From: Peter Hurley Message-ID: <5693ECF8.9020408@hurleysoftware.com> Date: Mon, 11 Jan 2016 09:57:12 -0800 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.4.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <568A530F.8020807@uclinux.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 01/04/2016 03:10 AM, Greg Ungerer wrote: > On 04/01/16 20:30, One Thousand Gnomes wrote: >> On Mon, 4 Jan 2016 15:03:50 +1000 >> Greg Ungerer wrote: >> >>> If 68328serial.c is removed is there any point keeping the >>> architecture support for 68328 platforms? >>> >>> The 68328serial.c provides pretty much the only type of console >>> that can be used on these devices. They are largely useless >>> without this >> >> Probably we should - unless someone wants to stand up and say "actually >> I'm using this with current kernels, need it, and I'll maintain it" >> >> Somehow I doubt anyone is. > > Yep, I suspect you are right. > I can't even remember the last time a patch or improvement > for 68328 came past me. Same goes for 68360 cpu/platform > as well. And none of it builds (and there's no build coverage in arch/m68k/configs) Regards, Peter Hurley