linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
To: Brian Gerst <brgerst@gmail.com>
Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>,
	the arch/x86 maintainers <x86@kernel.org>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
	Denys Vlasenko <dvlasenk@redhat.com>,
	Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86: static_cpu_has_safe: discard dynamic check after init
Date: Tue, 19 Jan 2016 20:42:10 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <569F1022.6040709@zytor.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAMzpN2hz4wUFf6Uc6TFovXmT6F-t8kbc9VQd_E=-p+K-TJaK2A@mail.gmail.com>

On 01/19/16 20:39, Brian Gerst wrote:
> 
> Can't put it in .init.text or else you get:
> WARNING: arch/x86/kernel/built-in.o(.text+0x4b9): Section mismatch in
> reference from the function __switch_to() to the (unknown reference)
> .init.text:(unknown)
> The function __switch_to() references
> the (unknown reference) __init (unknown).
> This is often because __switch_to lacks a __init
> annotation or the annotation of (unknown) is wrong.
> 
> We want to override that because we know that the reference will be
> removed after alternatives run.  That's why I created a new section.
> 

Right.  I wish we could tag reference call sites as clean, not sources
or targets.  Sigh.

However, that's not too much of an issue.

	-hpa

  reply	other threads:[~2016-01-20  4:42 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 66+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-01-16 19:22 [PATCH] x86: static_cpu_has_safe: discard dynamic check after init Brian Gerst
2016-01-16 19:36 ` Borislav Petkov
2016-01-16 19:58   ` Brian Gerst
2016-01-17 10:33     ` Borislav Petkov
2016-01-18 16:52       ` Brian Gerst
2016-01-18 17:49         ` Andy Lutomirski
2016-01-18 18:14         ` Borislav Petkov
2016-01-18 18:29           ` Andy Lutomirski
2016-01-18 18:39             ` Borislav Petkov
2016-01-18 19:45               ` H. Peter Anvin
2016-01-18 23:05                 ` Borislav Petkov
2016-01-18 23:13                   ` H. Peter Anvin
2016-01-18 23:25                     ` Borislav Petkov
2016-01-19 13:57                       ` Borislav Petkov
2016-01-19 16:23                         ` Borislav Petkov
2016-01-19 23:10                         ` Borislav Petkov
2016-01-19 23:26                           ` Andy Lutomirski
2016-01-19 23:49                             ` Boris Petkov
2016-01-20  4:03                         ` H. Peter Anvin
2016-01-20 10:33                           ` Borislav Petkov
2016-01-20 10:41                             ` H. Peter Anvin
2016-01-21 22:14                               ` Borislav Petkov
2016-01-21 22:22                                 ` H. Peter Anvin
2016-01-21 22:56                                   ` Borislav Petkov
2016-01-21 23:36                                     ` H. Peter Anvin
2016-01-21 23:37                                     ` H. Peter Anvin
2016-01-22 10:32                                       ` Borislav Petkov
2016-01-18 18:51           ` Borislav Petkov
2016-01-19  1:10             ` Borislav Petkov
2016-01-19  1:33               ` H. Peter Anvin
2016-01-19  9:22                 ` Borislav Petkov
2016-01-20  4:02                   ` H. Peter Anvin
2016-01-20  4:39                     ` Brian Gerst
2016-01-20  4:42                       ` H. Peter Anvin [this message]
2016-01-20 10:50                         ` Borislav Petkov
2016-01-20 10:55                           ` H. Peter Anvin
2016-01-20 11:05                             ` Borislav Petkov
2016-01-20 14:48                               ` H. Peter Anvin
2016-01-20 15:01                     ` Borislav Petkov
2016-01-20 15:09                       ` H. Peter Anvin
2016-01-20 16:04                         ` Borislav Petkov
2016-01-20 16:16                           ` H. Peter Anvin
2016-01-23  6:50 [PATCH] x86/head_64.S: do not use temporary register to check alignment Alexander Kuleshov
2016-01-26  9:31 ` Borislav Petkov
2016-01-26 21:12 [PATCH 00/10] tip-queue 2016-01-26, rest Borislav Petkov
2016-01-26 21:12 ` [PATCH 01/10] x86/asm: Add condition codes clobber to memory barrier macros Borislav Petkov
2016-01-26 21:12 ` [PATCH 02/10] x86/asm: Drop a comment left over from X86_OOSTORE Borislav Petkov
2016-01-26 21:12 ` [PATCH 03/10] x86/asm: Tweak the comment about wmb() use for IO Borislav Petkov
2016-01-26 21:12 ` [PATCH 04/10] x86/cpufeature: Carve out X86_FEATURE_* Borislav Petkov
2016-01-30 13:18   ` [tip:x86/asm] " tip-bot for Borislav Petkov
2016-01-26 21:12 ` [PATCH 05/10] x86/cpufeature: Replace the old static_cpu_has() with safe variant Borislav Petkov
2016-01-30 13:19   ` [tip:x86/asm] " tip-bot for Borislav Petkov
2016-01-26 21:12 ` [PATCH 06/10] x86/cpufeature: Get rid of the non-asm goto variant Borislav Petkov
2016-01-27  3:36   ` Brian Gerst
2016-01-27  8:41     ` Borislav Petkov
2016-01-27  8:43       ` [PATCH -v1.1 " Borislav Petkov
2016-01-30 13:19         ` [tip:x86/asm] " tip-bot for Borislav Petkov
2016-01-27  8:45       ` [PATCH -v1.1 8/10] x86/alternatives: Discard dynamic check after init Borislav Petkov
2016-01-30 13:20         ` [tip:x86/asm] " tip-bot for Brian Gerst
2016-01-26 21:12 ` [PATCH 07/10] x86/alternatives: Add an auxilary section Borislav Petkov
2016-01-30 13:19   ` [tip:x86/asm] " tip-bot for Borislav Petkov
2016-01-26 21:12 ` [PATCH 08/10] x86/alternatives: Discard dynamic check after init Borislav Petkov
2016-01-26 21:12 ` [PATCH 09/10] x86/vdso: Use static_cpu_has() Borislav Petkov
2016-01-30 13:20   ` [tip:x86/asm] " tip-bot for Borislav Petkov
2016-01-26 21:12 ` [PATCH 10/10] x86/head_64: Simplify kernel load address alignment check Borislav Petkov
2016-01-30 13:20   ` [tip:x86/boot] x86/boot: " tip-bot for Alexander Kuleshov

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=569F1022.6040709@zytor.com \
    --to=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=bp@suse.de \
    --cc=brgerst@gmail.com \
    --cc=dvlasenk@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=luto@amacapital.net \
    --cc=mingo@kernel.org \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).