From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id S1756602AbcCCDz5 (ORCPT <rfc822;w@1wt.eu>);
	Wed, 2 Mar 2016 22:55:57 -0500
Received: from mail-pa0-f52.google.com ([209.85.220.52]:34266 "EHLO
	mail-pa0-f52.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
	with ESMTP id S1753256AbcCCDzz (ORCPT
	<rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
	Wed, 2 Mar 2016 22:55:55 -0500
Subject: Re: [RFCv7 PATCH 04/10] sched/fair: add triggers for OPP change
 requests
To: Ricky Liang <jcliang@chromium.org>
References: <1456190570-4475-1-git-send-email-smuckle@linaro.org>
 <1456190570-4475-5-git-send-email-smuckle@linaro.org>
 <CAAJzSMcf69vWKWYR09cp8e11D0dYRDmVm91ietfshy3UgmMEiA@mail.gmail.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
        "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>,
        open list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org,
        Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>,
        Morten Rasmussen <morten.rasmussen@arm.com>,
        Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com>,
        Juri Lelli <Juri.Lelli@arm.com>,
        Patrick Bellasi <patrick.bellasi@arm.com>,
        Michael Turquette <mturquette@baylibre.com>
From: Steve Muckle <steve.muckle@linaro.org>
Message-ID: <56D7B5C8.7000504@linaro.org>
Date: Wed, 2 Mar 2016 19:55:52 -0800
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/38.2.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <CAAJzSMcf69vWKWYR09cp8e11D0dYRDmVm91ietfshy3UgmMEiA@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

Hi Ricky,

On 02/29/2016 10:51 PM, Ricky Liang wrote:
> The change hunks of this patch should probably all depend on
> CONFIG_SMP as capacity_orig_of() and cpu_util() are only available
> when CONFIG_SMP is enabled.

Yeah, I was deferring cleaning that up until there was more buy in on
the overall solution. But it looks like we will be moving forward using
Rafael's schedutil governor. The most recent posting of that is here:

http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel/2166378

thanks,
Steve