linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Hans Verkuil <hverkuil@xs4all.nl>
To: Benjamin Gaignard <benjamin.gaignard@collabora.com>, mchehab@kernel.org
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-media@vger.kernel.org,
	kernel@collabora.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v17 8/8] media: verisilicon: Support deleting buffers on capture queue
Date: Wed, 24 Jan 2024 13:52:13 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <56c1410e-7a4c-4913-823d-83b8bc0ac002@xs4all.nl> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240119094944.26763-9-benjamin.gaignard@collabora.com>

On 19/01/2024 10:49, Benjamin Gaignard wrote:
> Allow to delete buffers on capture queue because it the one which
> own the decoded buffers. After a dynamic resolution change lot of
> them could remain allocated but won't be used anymore so deleting
> them save memory.
> Do not add this feature on output queue because the buffers are
> smaller, fewer and always recycled even after a dynamic resolution
> change.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Benjamin Gaignard <benjamin.gaignard@collabora.com>
> ---
>  drivers/media/platform/verisilicon/hantro_drv.c  | 1 +
>  drivers/media/platform/verisilicon/hantro_v4l2.c | 1 +
>  2 files changed, 2 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/media/platform/verisilicon/hantro_drv.c b/drivers/media/platform/verisilicon/hantro_drv.c
> index db3df6cc4513..f6b0a676a740 100644
> --- a/drivers/media/platform/verisilicon/hantro_drv.c
> +++ b/drivers/media/platform/verisilicon/hantro_drv.c
> @@ -248,6 +248,7 @@ queue_init(void *priv, struct vb2_queue *src_vq, struct vb2_queue *dst_vq)
>  	dst_vq->timestamp_flags = V4L2_BUF_FLAG_TIMESTAMP_COPY;
>  	dst_vq->lock = &ctx->dev->vpu_mutex;
>  	dst_vq->dev = ctx->dev->v4l2_dev.dev;
> +	src_vq->supports_delete_bufs = true;

As I mentioned, I remain unconvinced by this. It is just making the API inconsistent
since if you support delete_bufs, then why support it for one queue only and not both?

>  
>  	return vb2_queue_init(dst_vq);
>  }
> diff --git a/drivers/media/platform/verisilicon/hantro_v4l2.c b/drivers/media/platform/verisilicon/hantro_v4l2.c
> index 941fa23c211a..34eab90e8a42 100644
> --- a/drivers/media/platform/verisilicon/hantro_v4l2.c
> +++ b/drivers/media/platform/verisilicon/hantro_v4l2.c
> @@ -756,6 +756,7 @@ const struct v4l2_ioctl_ops hantro_ioctl_ops = {
>  	.vidioc_dqbuf = v4l2_m2m_ioctl_dqbuf,
>  	.vidioc_prepare_buf = v4l2_m2m_ioctl_prepare_buf,
>  	.vidioc_create_bufs = v4l2_m2m_ioctl_create_bufs,
> +	.vidioc_delete_bufs = v4l2_m2m_ioctl_delete_bufs,
>  	.vidioc_expbuf = v4l2_m2m_ioctl_expbuf,
>  
>  	.vidioc_subscribe_event = v4l2_ctrl_subscribe_event,

In my view setting vidioc_delete_bufs should enable this feature, and if
for some strange reason only one queue support it, then make a wrapper
callback that returns an error when used with the wrong queue.

Also note that patch 6/8 never checks for q->supports_delete_bufs in
vb2_core_delete_bufs(), which is wrong!

Regards,

	Hans

  reply	other threads:[~2024-01-24 12:52 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-01-19  9:49 [PATCH v17 0/8] Add DELETE_BUF ioctl Benjamin Gaignard
2024-01-19  9:49 ` [PATCH v17 1/8] videobuf2: Add min_reqbufs_allocation field to vb2_queue structure Benjamin Gaignard
2024-01-24 11:31   ` Hans Verkuil
2024-01-19  9:49 ` [PATCH v17 2/8] media: test-drivers: Set REQBUFS minimum number of buffers Benjamin Gaignard
2024-01-19  9:49 ` [PATCH v17 3/8] media: core: Rework how create_buf index returned value is computed Benjamin Gaignard
2024-01-24 11:20   ` Hans Verkuil
2024-01-19  9:49 ` [PATCH v17 4/8] media: core: Add bitmap manage bufs array entries Benjamin Gaignard
2024-01-24 11:52   ` Hans Verkuil
2024-01-19  9:49 ` [PATCH v17 5/8] media: core: Free range of buffers Benjamin Gaignard
2024-01-19  9:49 ` [PATCH v17 6/8] media: v4l2: Add DELETE_BUFS ioctl Benjamin Gaignard
2024-01-24 12:33   ` Hans Verkuil
2024-01-24 12:59     ` Hans Verkuil
2024-01-24 15:35     ` Benjamin Gaignard
2024-01-24 15:46       ` Hans Verkuil
2024-01-19  9:49 ` [PATCH v17 7/8] media: v4l2: Add mem2mem helpers for " Benjamin Gaignard
2024-01-19  9:49 ` [PATCH v17 8/8] media: verisilicon: Support deleting buffers on capture queue Benjamin Gaignard
2024-01-24 12:52   ` Hans Verkuil [this message]
2024-01-24 15:35     ` Benjamin Gaignard
2024-01-24 15:44       ` Hans Verkuil
2024-01-25  9:27         ` Benjamin Gaignard
2024-01-25  9:50           ` Hans Verkuil
2024-01-25 16:27       ` Nicolas Dufresne
2024-01-26  9:17         ` Hans Verkuil

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=56c1410e-7a4c-4913-823d-83b8bc0ac002@xs4all.nl \
    --to=hverkuil@xs4all.nl \
    --cc=benjamin.gaignard@collabora.com \
    --cc=kernel@collabora.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-media@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mchehab@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).