From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6BF07C433EF for ; Tue, 23 Nov 2021 08:53:41 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S233696AbhKWI4r (ORCPT ); Tue, 23 Nov 2021 03:56:47 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:41552 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S231180AbhKWI4q (ORCPT ); Tue, 23 Nov 2021 03:56:46 -0500 Received: from wp530.webpack.hosteurope.de (wp530.webpack.hosteurope.de [IPv6:2a01:488:42:1000:50ed:8234::]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DB05EC061714; Tue, 23 Nov 2021 00:53:38 -0800 (PST) Received: from ip4d173d4a.dynamic.kabel-deutschland.de ([77.23.61.74] helo=[192.168.66.200]); authenticated by wp530.webpack.hosteurope.de running ExIM with esmtpsa (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) id 1mpRYV-0004bX-6r; Tue, 23 Nov 2021 09:53:35 +0100 Message-ID: <56d7b2d8-1c35-0365-5e85-e40d242c15f5@leemhuis.info> Date: Tue, 23 Nov 2021 09:53:33 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/91.3.0 Content-Language: en-BS To: Steven Rostedt Cc: workflows@vger.kernel.org, Linux Kernel Mailing List , Konstantin Ryabitsev , Jonathan Corbet References: <6b760115ecdd3687d4b82680b284f55a04f3ad90.1637566224.git.linux@leemhuis.info> <20211122112916.498810bb@gandalf.local.home> <20211122152426.7c2b3ab4@gandalf.local.home> From: Thorsten Leemhuis Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v1 1/1] docs: add the new commit-msg tags 'Reported:' and 'Reviewed:' In-Reply-To: <20211122152426.7c2b3ab4@gandalf.local.home> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-bounce-key: webpack.hosteurope.de;linux@leemhuis.info;1637657618;ada75402; X-HE-SMSGID: 1mpRYV-0004bX-6r Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 22.11.21 21:24, Steven Rostedt wrote: > On Mon, 22 Nov 2021 19:50:35 +0100 > Thorsten Leemhuis wrote: > >>> That said, I would like a way to have versions show a link to the last >>> version that was reviewed. >>> >>> v1: has no tags >>> >>> v2: has a Reviewed: tag to v1. >>> >>> v3: has a Reviewed: tag to v2 >>> >>> [...] >>> >>> Then the final commit could have a "Link" or "Reviewed" tag to v3, even >>> though there may not be any reviews to v3, but v3 has the link to v2, and >>> v2 has the link to v1, etc. >> >> Is that really worth it? Isn't it sufficient if the commit links to the >> last public review posting, as that already should link to all earlier >> review postings. Sure, not everybody is doing this right now, but maybe >> just educating people to do so is better than creating something new. > > Isn't "as that already should link to all earlier review postings" what I'm > suggesting above? I haven't seen many people do that yet. Yeah, you are right, sorry, my perception was wrong. Any maybe I got your suggestion wrong, but what you suggested sounded to me like "each patch should link to the previous submission of the patch". I just wonder if it's way easier and sufficient if just the cover letter links to the previous or all earlier submissions of the series in its revision history (sorry, I didn't should have made this more obvious in my earlier mail); for patches without a cover letter this obligation obviously would shift to the patch. IOW: I have something in mind like in this submission: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/cover.1637252610.git.sander@svanheule.net/ Only the cover letter links to the earlier version, not the individual patches. But I have no strong feeling here, I don't care much about this. Ciao, Thorsten