From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753257AbcDCKvM (ORCPT ); Sun, 3 Apr 2016 06:51:12 -0400 Received: from saturn.retrosnub.co.uk ([178.18.118.26]:49204 "EHLO saturn.retrosnub.co.uk" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752419AbcDCKvJ (ORCPT ); Sun, 3 Apr 2016 06:51:09 -0400 Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 08/24] iio: imu: inv_mpu6050: convert to use an explicit i2c mux core To: Peter Rosin , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org References: <1459673574-11440-1-git-send-email-peda@lysator.liu.se> <1459673574-11440-9-git-send-email-peda@lysator.liu.se> Cc: Peter Rosin , Wolfram Sang , Jonathan Corbet , Peter Korsgaard , Guenter Roeck , Hartmut Knaack , Lars-Peter Clausen , Peter Meerwald , Antti Palosaari , Mauro Carvalho Chehab , Rob Herring , Frank Rowand , Grant Likely , Andrew Morton , Greg Kroah-Hartman , "David S. Miller" , Kalle Valo , Joe Perches , Jiri Slaby , Daniel Baluta , Adriana Reus , Lucas De Marchi , Matt Ranostay , Krzysztof Kozlowski , Terry Heo , Hans Verkuil , Arnd Bergmann , Tommi Rantala , linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-iio@vger.kernel.org, linux-media@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org From: Jonathan Cameron Message-ID: <5700F594.9090105@kernel.org> Date: Sun, 3 Apr 2016 11:51:00 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.7.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <1459673574-11440-9-git-send-email-peda@lysator.liu.se> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 03/04/16 09:52, Peter Rosin wrote: > From: Peter Rosin > > Allocate an explicit i2c mux core to handle parent and child adapters > etc. Update the select/deselect ops to be in terms of the i2c mux core > instead of the child adapter. > > Signed-off-by: Peter Rosin I'm mostly fine with this (though one unrelated change seems to have snuck in). However, I'm not set up to test it - hence other than fixing the change you can have my ack, but ideal would be a tested by from someone with relevant hardware... However, it looks to be a fairly mechanical change so if no one is currently setup to test it, then don't let it hold up the series too long! Acked-by: Jonathan Cameron Jonathan > --- > drivers/iio/imu/inv_mpu6050/inv_mpu_acpi.c | 2 +- > drivers/iio/imu/inv_mpu6050/inv_mpu_core.c | 1 - > drivers/iio/imu/inv_mpu6050/inv_mpu_i2c.c | 32 +++++++++++++----------------- > drivers/iio/imu/inv_mpu6050/inv_mpu_iio.h | 3 ++- > 4 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/iio/imu/inv_mpu6050/inv_mpu_acpi.c b/drivers/iio/imu/inv_mpu6050/inv_mpu_acpi.c > index 2771106fd650..f62b8bd9ad7e 100644 > --- a/drivers/iio/imu/inv_mpu6050/inv_mpu_acpi.c > +++ b/drivers/iio/imu/inv_mpu6050/inv_mpu_acpi.c > @@ -183,7 +183,7 @@ int inv_mpu_acpi_create_mux_client(struct i2c_client *client) > } else > return 0; /* no secondary addr, which is OK */ > } > - st->mux_client = i2c_new_device(st->mux_adapter, &info); > + st->mux_client = i2c_new_device(st->muxc->adapter[0], &info); > if (!st->mux_client) > return -ENODEV; > } > diff --git a/drivers/iio/imu/inv_mpu6050/inv_mpu_core.c b/drivers/iio/imu/inv_mpu6050/inv_mpu_core.c > index d192953e9a38..0c2bded2b5b7 100644 > --- a/drivers/iio/imu/inv_mpu6050/inv_mpu_core.c > +++ b/drivers/iio/imu/inv_mpu6050/inv_mpu_core.c > @@ -23,7 +23,6 @@ > #include > #include > #include > -#include > #include > #include "inv_mpu_iio.h" > > diff --git a/drivers/iio/imu/inv_mpu6050/inv_mpu_i2c.c b/drivers/iio/imu/inv_mpu6050/inv_mpu_i2c.c > index f581256d9d4c..0d429d788106 100644 > --- a/drivers/iio/imu/inv_mpu6050/inv_mpu_i2c.c > +++ b/drivers/iio/imu/inv_mpu6050/inv_mpu_i2c.c > @@ -15,7 +15,6 @@ > #include > #include > #include > -#include > #include > #include > #include "inv_mpu_iio.h" > @@ -52,10 +51,9 @@ static int inv_mpu6050_write_reg_unlocked(struct i2c_client *client, > return 0; > } > > -static int inv_mpu6050_select_bypass(struct i2c_adapter *adap, void *mux_priv, > - u32 chan_id) > +static int inv_mpu6050_select_bypass(struct i2c_mux_core *muxc, u32 chan_id) > { > - struct i2c_client *client = mux_priv; > + struct i2c_client *client = i2c_mux_priv(muxc); > struct iio_dev *indio_dev = dev_get_drvdata(&client->dev); > struct inv_mpu6050_state *st = iio_priv(indio_dev); > int ret = 0; > @@ -84,10 +82,9 @@ write_error: > return ret; > } > > -static int inv_mpu6050_deselect_bypass(struct i2c_adapter *adap, > - void *mux_priv, u32 chan_id) > +static int inv_mpu6050_deselect_bypass(struct i2c_mux_core *muxc, u32 chan_id) > { > - struct i2c_client *client = mux_priv; > + struct i2c_client *client = i2c_mux_priv(muxc); > struct iio_dev *indio_dev = dev_get_drvdata(&client->dev); > struct inv_mpu6050_state *st = iio_priv(indio_dev); > > @@ -136,16 +133,15 @@ static int inv_mpu_probe(struct i2c_client *client, > return result; > > st = iio_priv(dev_get_drvdata(&client->dev)); > - st->mux_adapter = i2c_add_mux_adapter(client->adapter, > - &client->dev, > - client, > - 0, 0, 0, > - inv_mpu6050_select_bypass, > - inv_mpu6050_deselect_bypass); > - if (!st->mux_adapter) { > - result = -ENODEV; > + st->muxc = i2c_mux_one_adapter(client->adapter, &client->dev, 0, 0, > + 0, 0, 0, > + inv_mpu6050_select_bypass, > + inv_mpu6050_deselect_bypass); > + if (IS_ERR(st->muxc)) { > + result = PTR_ERR(st->muxc); > goto out_unreg_device; > } > + st->muxc->priv = client; > > result = inv_mpu_acpi_create_mux_client(client); > if (result) > @@ -154,7 +150,7 @@ static int inv_mpu_probe(struct i2c_client *client, > return 0; > > out_del_mux: > - i2c_del_mux_adapter(st->mux_adapter); > + i2c_mux_del_adapters(st->muxc); > out_unreg_device: > inv_mpu_core_remove(&client->dev); > return result; > @@ -162,11 +158,11 @@ out_unreg_device: > > static int inv_mpu_remove(struct i2c_client *client) > { > - struct iio_dev *indio_dev = i2c_get_clientdata(client); > + struct iio_dev *indio_dev = dev_get_drvdata(&client->dev); Why this change? Seems unrelated. > struct inv_mpu6050_state *st = iio_priv(indio_dev); > > inv_mpu_acpi_delete_mux_client(client); > - i2c_del_mux_adapter(st->mux_adapter); > + i2c_mux_del_adapters(st->muxc); > > return inv_mpu_core_remove(&client->dev); > } > diff --git a/drivers/iio/imu/inv_mpu6050/inv_mpu_iio.h b/drivers/iio/imu/inv_mpu6050/inv_mpu_iio.h > index e302a49703bf..bb3cef6d7059 100644 > --- a/drivers/iio/imu/inv_mpu6050/inv_mpu_iio.h > +++ b/drivers/iio/imu/inv_mpu6050/inv_mpu_iio.h > @@ -11,6 +11,7 @@ > * GNU General Public License for more details. > */ > #include > +#include > #include > #include > #include > @@ -127,7 +128,7 @@ struct inv_mpu6050_state { > const struct inv_mpu6050_hw *hw; > enum inv_devices chip_type; > spinlock_t time_stamp_lock; > - struct i2c_adapter *mux_adapter; > + struct i2c_mux_core *muxc; > struct i2c_client *mux_client; > unsigned int powerup_count; > struct inv_mpu6050_platform_data plat_data; >