From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Fri, 24 Jan 2003 04:40:02 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Fri, 24 Jan 2003 04:40:02 -0500 Received: from [210.212.228.4] ([210.212.228.4]:46009 "EHLO cnet.nitc.ac.in") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Fri, 24 Jan 2003 04:40:01 -0500 Message-ID: <57047.210.212.228.78.1043401756.webmail@mail.nitc.ac.in> Date: Fri, 24 Jan 2003 15:19:16 +0530 (IST) Subject: Re: your mail From: "Anoop J." To: In-Reply-To: References: <54208.210.212.228.78.1043398260.webmail@mail.nitc.ac.in> Cc: , X-Mailer: nitc webmail (version 1.2.7) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org ok i shall put it in another way since virtual indexing is a representation of the virtual memory, it is possible for more multiple virtual addresses to represent the same physical address.So the problem of aliasing occurs in the cache.Does page coloring guarantee a unique mapping of physical address.If so how is the maping from virtual to physical address Thanks > I think this is a case of the same tuerm being used for two different > purposes. I don't know the use you are refering to. > > David Lang > > >