Re: [RFT v2] iommu/amd: use subsys_initcall() on amdv2 iommu

["Christian König" <christian.koenig@amd.com>]

Am 11.04.2016 um 15:39 schrieb Oded Gabbay:
> On Mon, Apr 11, 2016 at 4:28 PM, Christian König
> <christian.koenig@amd.com> wrote:
>> Am 09.04.2016 um 02:25 schrieb Luis R. Rodriguez:
>>> On Tue, Mar 29, 2016 at 10:41 AM, Luis R. Rodriguez <mcgrof@kernel.org> wrote:
>>>> We need to ensure amd iommu v2 initializes before
>>>> driver uses such as drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdkfd/kfd_module.c,
>>>> to do this make its init routine a subsys_initcall() which
>>>> ensures its load init is called first than modules when
>>>> built-in.
>>>>
>>>> This reverts the old work around implemented through commit
>>>> 1bacc894c227fad8a7 ("drivers: Move iommu/ before gpu/ in Makefile"),
>>>> instead of making the dependency implicit by linker order this
>>>> makes the ordering requirement explicit through proper kernel
>>>> APIs.
>>>>
>>>> Cc: Oded Gabbay <oded.gabbay@amd.com>
>>>> Cc: Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Luis R. Rodriguez <mcgrof@kernel.org>
>>
>> Sorry for not responding earlier. Just coming back to all the stuff on my TODO list.
>>
>> Patch is Acked-by: Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com>
>
> Christian,
> Just wanted to be sure if you tested this patch-set or not.

I did NOT tested it. If AMD IOMMU requires something which will now 
initialize after the IOMMU module we will obviously run into trouble again.

I assumed that the creator of the patch did some testing.

>
> I don't think it should be merged without testing. If you already
> tested it than fine. If not, I think I can do it in the next week or
> so (just came back from PTO).

Yeah, agree totally.

Regards,
Christian.

>
> Oded
>
>>
>> Regards,
>> Christian.
>>
>>> *poke*
>>>
>>>    Luis
>>