linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [PATCH] powerpc/hw_breakpoint: move instruction stepping out of hw_breakpoint_handler()
@ 2019-06-28 15:55 Christophe Leroy
  2019-07-03  6:20 ` Ravi Bangoria
  2019-08-22 13:08 ` Michael Ellerman
  0 siblings, 2 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Christophe Leroy @ 2019-06-28 15:55 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Benjamin Herrenschmidt, Paul Mackerras, Michael Ellerman
  Cc: linux-kernel, linuxppc-dev

On 8xx, breakpoints stop after executing the instruction, so
stepping/emulation is not needed. Move it into a sub-function and
remove the #ifdefs.

Signed-off-by: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@c-s.fr>
---
 arch/powerpc/kernel/hw_breakpoint.c | 60 ++++++++++++++++++++-----------------
 1 file changed, 33 insertions(+), 27 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/hw_breakpoint.c b/arch/powerpc/kernel/hw_breakpoint.c
index a293a53b4365..a94142e729bf 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/hw_breakpoint.c
+++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/hw_breakpoint.c
@@ -198,15 +198,43 @@ void thread_change_pc(struct task_struct *tsk, struct pt_regs *regs)
 /*
  * Handle debug exception notifications.
  */
+static bool stepping_handler(struct pt_regs *regs, struct perf_event *bp,
+			     unsigned long addr)
+{
+	int stepped;
+	unsigned int instr;
+
+	/* Do not emulate user-space instructions, instead single-step them */
+	if (user_mode(regs)) {
+		current->thread.last_hit_ubp = bp;
+		regs->msr |= MSR_SE;
+		return false;
+	}
+
+	stepped = 0;
+	instr = 0;
+	if (!__get_user_inatomic(instr, (unsigned int *)regs->nip))
+		stepped = emulate_step(regs, instr);
+
+	/*
+	 * emulate_step() could not execute it. We've failed in reliably
+	 * handling the hw-breakpoint. Unregister it and throw a warning
+	 * message to let the user know about it.
+	 */
+	if (!stepped) {
+		WARN(1, "Unable to handle hardware breakpoint. Breakpoint at "
+			"0x%lx will be disabled.", addr);
+		perf_event_disable_inatomic(bp);
+		return false;
+	}
+	return true;
+}
+
 int hw_breakpoint_handler(struct die_args *args)
 {
 	int rc = NOTIFY_STOP;
 	struct perf_event *bp;
 	struct pt_regs *regs = args->regs;
-#ifndef CONFIG_PPC_8xx
-	int stepped = 1;
-	unsigned int instr;
-#endif
 	struct arch_hw_breakpoint *info;
 	unsigned long dar = regs->dar;
 
@@ -251,32 +279,10 @@ int hw_breakpoint_handler(struct die_args *args)
 	      (dar - bp->attr.bp_addr < bp->attr.bp_len)))
 		info->type |= HW_BRK_TYPE_EXTRANEOUS_IRQ;
 
-#ifndef CONFIG_PPC_8xx
-	/* Do not emulate user-space instructions, instead single-step them */
-	if (user_mode(regs)) {
-		current->thread.last_hit_ubp = bp;
-		regs->msr |= MSR_SE;
+	if (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_PPC_8xx) && !stepping_handler(regs, bp, info->address))
 		goto out;
-	}
-
-	stepped = 0;
-	instr = 0;
-	if (!__get_user_inatomic(instr, (unsigned int *) regs->nip))
-		stepped = emulate_step(regs, instr);
 
 	/*
-	 * emulate_step() could not execute it. We've failed in reliably
-	 * handling the hw-breakpoint. Unregister it and throw a warning
-	 * message to let the user know about it.
-	 */
-	if (!stepped) {
-		WARN(1, "Unable to handle hardware breakpoint. Breakpoint at "
-			"0x%lx will be disabled.", info->address);
-		perf_event_disable_inatomic(bp);
-		goto out;
-	}
-#endif
-	/*
 	 * As a policy, the callback is invoked in a 'trigger-after-execute'
 	 * fashion
 	 */
-- 
2.13.3


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH] powerpc/hw_breakpoint: move instruction stepping out of hw_breakpoint_handler()
  2019-06-28 15:55 [PATCH] powerpc/hw_breakpoint: move instruction stepping out of hw_breakpoint_handler() Christophe Leroy
@ 2019-07-03  6:20 ` Ravi Bangoria
  2019-07-06  8:26   ` Christophe Leroy
  2019-08-22 13:08 ` Michael Ellerman
  1 sibling, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Ravi Bangoria @ 2019-07-03  6:20 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Christophe Leroy
  Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt, Paul Mackerras, Michael Ellerman,
	linux-kernel, linuxppc-dev, Ravi Bangoria



On 6/28/19 9:25 PM, Christophe Leroy wrote:
> On 8xx, breakpoints stop after executing the instruction, so
> stepping/emulation is not needed. Move it into a sub-function and
> remove the #ifdefs.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@c-s.fr>
> ---

Reviewed-by: Ravi Bangoria <ravi.bangoria@linux.ibm.com>

Just one neat below...

[...]

> -#ifndef CONFIG_PPC_8xx
> -	/* Do not emulate user-space instructions, instead single-step them */
> -	if (user_mode(regs)) {
> -		current->thread.last_hit_ubp = bp;
> -		regs->msr |= MSR_SE;
> +	if (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_PPC_8xx) && !stepping_handler(regs, bp, info->address))

May be split this line. It's 86 chars long and checkpatch.pl is warning
about this:

WARNING: line over 80 characters
#257: FILE: arch/powerpc/kernel/hw_breakpoint.c:282:
+	if (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_PPC_8xx) && !stepping_handler(regs, bp, info->address))


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH] powerpc/hw_breakpoint: move instruction stepping out of hw_breakpoint_handler()
  2019-07-03  6:20 ` Ravi Bangoria
@ 2019-07-06  8:26   ` Christophe Leroy
  2019-07-08  3:40     ` Ravi Bangoria
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Christophe Leroy @ 2019-07-06  8:26 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Ravi Bangoria
  Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt, Paul Mackerras, Michael Ellerman,
	linux-kernel, linuxppc-dev



Le 03/07/2019 à 08:20, Ravi Bangoria a écrit :
> 
> 
> On 6/28/19 9:25 PM, Christophe Leroy wrote:
>> On 8xx, breakpoints stop after executing the instruction, so
>> stepping/emulation is not needed. Move it into a sub-function and
>> remove the #ifdefs.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@c-s.fr>
>> ---
> 
> Reviewed-by: Ravi Bangoria <ravi.bangoria@linux.ibm.com>
> 
> Just one neat below...

Thanks for the review.

> 
> [...]
> 
>> -#ifndef CONFIG_PPC_8xx
>> -	/* Do not emulate user-space instructions, instead single-step them */
>> -	if (user_mode(regs)) {
>> -		current->thread.last_hit_ubp = bp;
>> -		regs->msr |= MSR_SE;
>> +	if (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_PPC_8xx) && !stepping_handler(regs, bp, info->address))
> 
> May be split this line. It's 86 chars long and checkpatch.pl is warning
> about this:

Didn't you use arch/powerpc/tools/checkpatch.sh ?

powerpc accepts 90 chars per line.

Christophe

> 
> WARNING: line over 80 characters
> #257: FILE: arch/powerpc/kernel/hw_breakpoint.c:282:
> +	if (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_PPC_8xx) && !stepping_handler(regs, bp, info->address))
> 

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH] powerpc/hw_breakpoint: move instruction stepping out of hw_breakpoint_handler()
  2019-07-06  8:26   ` Christophe Leroy
@ 2019-07-08  3:40     ` Ravi Bangoria
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Ravi Bangoria @ 2019-07-08  3:40 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Christophe Leroy
  Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt, Paul Mackerras, Michael Ellerman,
	linux-kernel, linuxppc-dev, Ravi Bangoria



On 7/6/19 1:56 PM, Christophe Leroy wrote:
> 
> 
> Le 03/07/2019 à 08:20, Ravi Bangoria a écrit :
>>
>>
>> On 6/28/19 9:25 PM, Christophe Leroy wrote:
>>> On 8xx, breakpoints stop after executing the instruction, so
>>> stepping/emulation is not needed. Move it into a sub-function and
>>> remove the #ifdefs.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@c-s.fr>
>>> ---
>>
>> Reviewed-by: Ravi Bangoria <ravi.bangoria@linux.ibm.com>
>>
>> Just one neat below...
> 
> Thanks for the review.
> 
>>
>> [...]
>>
>>> -#ifndef CONFIG_PPC_8xx
>>> -    /* Do not emulate user-space instructions, instead single-step them */
>>> -    if (user_mode(regs)) {
>>> -        current->thread.last_hit_ubp = bp;
>>> -        regs->msr |= MSR_SE;
>>> +    if (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_PPC_8xx) && !stepping_handler(regs, bp, info->address))
>>
>> May be split this line. It's 86 chars long and checkpatch.pl is warning
>> about this:
> 
> Didn't you use arch/powerpc/tools/checkpatch.sh ?
> 
> powerpc accepts 90 chars per line.

Hmm.. wasn't aware of it. Thanks!


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH] powerpc/hw_breakpoint: move instruction stepping out of hw_breakpoint_handler()
  2019-06-28 15:55 [PATCH] powerpc/hw_breakpoint: move instruction stepping out of hw_breakpoint_handler() Christophe Leroy
  2019-07-03  6:20 ` Ravi Bangoria
@ 2019-08-22 13:08 ` Michael Ellerman
  1 sibling, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Michael Ellerman @ 2019-08-22 13:08 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Christophe Leroy, Benjamin Herrenschmidt, Paul Mackerras
  Cc: linuxppc-dev, linux-kernel

On Fri, 2019-06-28 at 15:55:52 UTC, Christophe Leroy wrote:
> On 8xx, breakpoints stop after executing the instruction, so
> stepping/emulation is not needed. Move it into a sub-function and
> remove the #ifdefs.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@c-s.fr>
> Reviewed-by: Ravi Bangoria <ravi.bangoria@linux.ibm.com>

Applied to powerpc next, thanks.

https://git.kernel.org/powerpc/c/658d029df0bce6472c94b724ca54d74bc6659c2e

cheers

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2019-08-22 13:08 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2019-06-28 15:55 [PATCH] powerpc/hw_breakpoint: move instruction stepping out of hw_breakpoint_handler() Christophe Leroy
2019-07-03  6:20 ` Ravi Bangoria
2019-07-06  8:26   ` Christophe Leroy
2019-07-08  3:40     ` Ravi Bangoria
2019-08-22 13:08 ` Michael Ellerman

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).