From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752999AbcDRNtW (ORCPT ); Mon, 18 Apr 2016 09:49:22 -0400 Received: from smtp.codeaurora.org ([198.145.29.96]:42984 "EHLO smtp.codeaurora.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752677AbcDRNtT (ORCPT ); Mon, 18 Apr 2016 09:49:19 -0400 Subject: Re: [PATCH V2] net: ethernet: mellanox: correct page conversion To: Christoph Hellwig References: <1460845412-13120-1-git-send-email-okaya@codeaurora.org> <20160418121247.GA25387@infradead.org> <0c6a430c5f0ec64f51d7c594ef9751dd@codeaurora.org> <20160418131058.GA25421@infradead.org> Cc: linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org, timur@codeaurora.org, cov@codeaurora.org, Yishai Hadas , netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org From: Sinan Kaya Message-ID: <5714E5D6.7050600@codeaurora.org> Date: Mon, 18 Apr 2016 09:49:10 -0400 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.7.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20160418131058.GA25421@infradead.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 4/18/2016 9:10 AM, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > On Mon, Apr 18, 2016 at 09:06:18AM -0400, okaya@codeaurora.org wrote: >> On 2016-04-18 08:12, Christoph Hellwig wrote: >>> On Sat, Apr 16, 2016 at 06:23:32PM -0400, Sinan Kaya wrote: >>>> Current code is assuming that the address returned by dma_alloc_coherent >>>> is a logical address. This is not true on ARM/ARM64 systems. >>> >>> Can you explain what you mean with a 'logical address' and what actual >>> issue you're trying to solve? >> Here is a good description of logical address vs. virtual address. https://www.quora.com/What-is-the-Kernel-logical-and-virtual-addresses-What-is-the-difference-between-them-What-is-the-type-of-addresses-listed-in-the-System-map >> Vmap call is failing on arm64 systems because dma alloc api already returns >> an address mapped with vmap. > > Please state your problem clearly. What I'm reverse engineering from > your posts is: because dma_alloc_coherent uses vmap-like mappings on > arm64 (all, some systems?) All arm64 systems. >a driver using a lot of them might run into > limits of the vmap pool size. > > Is this correct? > No, the driver is plain broken without this patch. It causes a kernel panic during driver probe. This is the definition of vmap API. https://www.kernel.org/doc/htmldocs/kernel-api/API-vmap.html VMAP allows you to make several pages look contiguous to the CPU. It can only be used against logical addresses returned from kmalloc or alloc_page. You cannot take several virtually mapped addresses returned by dma_alloc_coherent and try to make them virtually contiguous again. The code happens to work on other architectures by pure luck. AFAIK, dma_alloc_coherent returns logical addresses on Intel systems until it runs out of DMA memory. After that intel arch will also start returning virtually mapped addresses and this code will also fail. ARM64 on the other hand always returns a virtually mapped address. The goal of this code is to allocate a bunch of page sized memory and make it look contiguous. It is just using the wrong API. The correct API is either kmalloc or alloc_page map it with dma_map_page not dma_alloc_coherent. The proper usage of dma_map_page requires code to call dma_sync API in correct places to be compatible with noncoherent systems. This code is already assuming coherency. It would be a nice to have dma_sync APIs in right places. There is no harm in calling dma_sync API for coherent systems as they are no-ops in DMA mapping layer whereas it is a cache flush for non-coherent systems. >> >> Please see arch/arm64/mm directory. > ---end quoted text--- > I hope it is clear now. The previous email was the most I could type on my phone. -- Sinan Kaya Qualcomm Technologies, Inc. on behalf of Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum, a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project