From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932207AbcDTJGx (ORCPT ); Wed, 20 Apr 2016 05:06:53 -0400 Received: from 7of9.schinagl.nl ([88.159.158.68]:38450 "EHLO 7of9.schinagl.nl" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751936AbcDTJGu (ORCPT ); Wed, 20 Apr 2016 05:06:50 -0400 Subject: Re: [PATCHv1 0/6] leds: pca9653x: support inverted outputs and cleanups To: Ricardo Ribalda Delgado References: <1461051650-18824-1-git-send-email-oliver@schinagl.nl> <5715F927.3030102@samsung.com> <5715FCE8.7080106@schinagl.nl> <57163252.5090000@schinagl.nl> <57172DFA.9030107@schinagl.nl> <5717430D.30702@schinagl.nl> Cc: Jacek Anaszewski , Rob Herring , Pawel Moll , Mark Rutland , Ian Campbell , Kumar Gala , Richard Purdie , "devicetree@vger.kernel.org" , LKML , Linux LED Subsystem , Peter Meerwald From: Olliver Schinagl Message-ID: <571746A2.8040609@schinagl.nl> Date: Wed, 20 Apr 2016 11:06:42 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Icedove/38.6.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 20-04-16 10:56, Ricardo Ribalda Delgado wrote: > Hi > > On Wed, Apr 20, 2016 at 10:51 AM, Olliver Schinagl wrote: > >>> As I said before, the reason for this proposal is that the code NEVER >>> clears PCA963X_MODE2_DMBLNK, only sets it. >>> Unfortunately I do not have the HW to test this change. >> The code never clears it, but the hardware does. So we have to set it >> everytime we enable blink. > Ok, that was the part I was missing. I was not aware that the hw was > clearing it. The devil is in the details :) > Saving mode2 sounds like a good compromise then. > > But I still believe that we should limit the lock to ledout. No matter > what we do, we cannot have two leds blinking at different frequencies > on the same chip. So to save a mutex a little bit, we take the risk that nobody else enables the blink or if they do, enable it in the same way? If it saves so much, then I guess its worth the risk I suppose? > > > Regards >