From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id S1753620AbcEINVL (ORCPT <rfc822;w@1wt.eu>);
	Mon, 9 May 2016 09:21:11 -0400
Received: from bh-25.webhostbox.net ([208.91.199.152]:47600 "EHLO
	bh-25.webhostbox.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
	with ESMTP id S1753586AbcEINVF (ORCPT
	<rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
	Mon, 9 May 2016 09:21:05 -0400
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3.14 00/23] 3.14.69-stable review
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
References: <20160509071646.726412064@linuxfoundation.org>
Cc: torvalds@linux-foundation.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org,
        shuah.kh@samsung.com, patches@kernelci.org, stable@vger.kernel.org
From: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>
Message-ID: <57308EB5.30707@roeck-us.net>
Date: Mon, 9 May 2016 06:20:53 -0700
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/38.7.2
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <20160509071646.726412064@linuxfoundation.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Authenticated_sender: linux@roeck-us.net
X-OutGoing-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.0
X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report
X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - bh-25.webhostbox.net
X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - vger.kernel.org
X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [47 12] / [47 12]
X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - roeck-us.net
X-Get-Message-Sender-Via: bh-25.webhostbox.net: authenticated_id: linux@roeck-us.net
X-Authenticated-Sender: bh-25.webhostbox.net: linux@roeck-us.net
X-Source: 
X-Source-Args: 
X-Source-Dir: 
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

On 05/09/2016 12:17 AM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 3.14.69 release.
> There are 23 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Wed May 11 07:16:11 UTC 2016.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>

Build results:
	total: 129 pass: 129 fail: 0
Qemu test results:
	total: 90 pass: 90 fail: 0

Runtime warnings (mainstone:mainstone_defconfig):

WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 0 at kernel/irq/chip.c:670 __irq_set_handler+0x118/0x128()
Modules linked in:
CPU: 0 PID: 0 Comm: swapper Not tainted 3.14.68-00023-g982ed6e #1
[<c000d23c>] (unwind_backtrace) from [<c000b6ec>] (show_stack+0x10/0x14)
[<c000b6ec>] (show_stack) from [<c0015628>] (warn_slowpath_common+0x6c/0x8c)
[<c0015628>] (warn_slowpath_common) from [<c0015664>] (warn_slowpath_null+0x1c/0x24)
[<c0015664>] (warn_slowpath_null) from [<c0042f58>] (__irq_set_handler+0x118/0x128)
[<c0042f58>] (__irq_set_handler) from [<c0355a30>] (mainstone_init_irq+0x84/0xa4)
[<c0355a30>] (mainstone_init_irq) from [<c0352154>] (init_IRQ+0x14/0x1c)
[<c0352154>] (init_IRQ) from [<c03508d4>] (start_kernel+0x1b8/0x350)
[<c03508d4>] (start_kernel) from [<a0008040>] (0xa0008040)70 __irq_set_handler+0x118/0x128()

To be fair, this is not a new warning. Only reason for it to show up now is that
I recently added mainstone to my list of tests. The problem is also seen with v3.14.
I do not see it with the current mainline kernel, so it must have been fixed
at some point. I may do a reverse bisect if I find the time. For the time being,
this is not a concern.

Details are available at http://kerneltests.org/builders.

Guenter