linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Alistair Popple <apopple@nvidia.com>
To: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>
Cc: <linux-mm@kvack.org>, <nouveau@lists.freedesktop.org>,
	<bskeggs@redhat.com>, <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	<linux-doc@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	<dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org>, <jhubbard@nvidia.com>,
	<rcampbell@nvidia.com>, <jglisse@redhat.com>, <jgg@nvidia.com>,
	<hch@infradead.org>, <daniel@ffwll.ch>, <willy@infradead.org>,
	<bsingharora@gmail.com>, Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 5/8] mm: Device exclusive memory access
Date: Wed, 19 May 2021 22:46:43 +1000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <5737557.YXifvZZQQ8@nvdebian> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <YKUCtA4FrfmkNrn7@t490s>

On Wednesday, 19 May 2021 10:21:08 PM AEST Peter Xu wrote:
> External email: Use caution opening links or attachments
> 
> On Wed, May 19, 2021 at 09:35:10PM +1000, Alistair Popple wrote:
> > I think the approach you are describing is similar to what
> > migrate_vma_collect()/migrate_vma_unamp() does now and I think it could be
> > made to work. I ended up going with the GUP+unmap approach in part because
> > Christoph suggested it but primarily because it required less code
> > especially given we needed to call something to fault the page in/break
> > COW anyway (or extend what was there to call handle_mm_fault(), etc.).
> 
> I see, thank. Would you mind add a short paragraph in the commit message
> talking about these two solutions and why we choose the GUP way?

Sure.

 - Alistair

> --
> Peter Xu





  reply	other threads:[~2021-05-19 12:46 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 42+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-04-07  8:42 [PATCH v8 0/8] Add support for SVM atomics in Nouveau Alistair Popple
2021-04-07  8:42 ` [PATCH v8 1/8] mm: Remove special swap entry functions Alistair Popple
2021-05-18  2:17   ` Peter Xu
2021-05-18 11:58     ` Alistair Popple
2021-05-18 14:17       ` Peter Xu
2021-04-07  8:42 ` [PATCH v8 2/8] mm/swapops: Rework swap entry manipulation code Alistair Popple
2021-04-07  8:42 ` [PATCH v8 3/8] mm/rmap: Split try_to_munlock from try_to_unmap Alistair Popple
2021-05-18 20:04   ` Liam Howlett
2021-05-19 12:38     ` Alistair Popple
2021-05-20 20:24       ` Liam Howlett
2021-05-21  2:23         ` Alistair Popple
2021-04-07  8:42 ` [PATCH v8 4/8] mm/rmap: Split migration into its own function Alistair Popple
2021-04-07  8:42 ` [PATCH v8 5/8] mm: Device exclusive memory access Alistair Popple
2021-05-18  2:08   ` Peter Xu
2021-05-18 13:19     ` Alistair Popple
2021-05-18 17:27       ` Peter Xu
2021-05-18 17:33         ` Jason Gunthorpe
2021-05-18 18:01           ` Peter Xu
2021-05-18 19:45             ` Jason Gunthorpe
2021-05-18 20:29               ` Peter Xu
2021-05-18 23:03                 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2021-05-18 23:45                   ` Peter Xu
2021-05-19 11:04                     ` Alistair Popple
2021-05-19 12:15                       ` Peter Xu
2021-05-19 13:11                         ` Alistair Popple
2021-05-19 14:04                           ` Peter Xu
2021-05-19 13:28                     ` Jason Gunthorpe
2021-05-19 14:09                       ` Peter Xu
2021-05-19 18:11                         ` Jason Gunthorpe
2021-05-19 11:35         ` Alistair Popple
2021-05-19 12:21           ` Peter Xu
2021-05-19 12:46             ` Alistair Popple [this message]
2021-05-21  6:53       ` Alistair Popple
2021-05-18 21:16   ` Peter Xu
2021-05-19 10:49     ` Alistair Popple
2021-05-19 12:24       ` Peter Xu
2021-05-19 12:46         ` Alistair Popple
2021-04-07  8:42 ` [PATCH v8 6/8] mm: Selftests for exclusive device memory Alistair Popple
2021-04-07  8:42 ` [PATCH v8 7/8] nouveau/svm: Refactor nouveau_range_fault Alistair Popple
2021-04-07  8:42 ` [PATCH v8 8/8] nouveau/svm: Implement atomic SVM access Alistair Popple
2021-05-21  4:04   ` Ben Skeggs
2021-05-06  7:43 ` [PATCH v8 0/8] Add support for SVM atomics in Nouveau Alistair Popple

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=5737557.YXifvZZQQ8@nvdebian \
    --to=apopple@nvidia.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=bsingharora@gmail.com \
    --cc=bskeggs@redhat.com \
    --cc=daniel@ffwll.ch \
    --cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=hch@infradead.org \
    --cc=hch@lst.de \
    --cc=jgg@nvidia.com \
    --cc=jglisse@redhat.com \
    --cc=jhubbard@nvidia.com \
    --cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=nouveau@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=peterx@redhat.com \
    --cc=rcampbell@nvidia.com \
    --cc=willy@infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).