From: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>
To: stable <stable@vger.kernel.org>,
Linux MIPS Mailing List <linux-mips@linux-mips.org>,
Ben Hutchings <ben@decadent.org.uk>,
Li Zefan <lizefan@huawei.com>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Building older mips kernels with different versions of binutils; possible patch for 3.2 and 3.4
Date: Sun, 15 May 2016 19:56:35 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <573936E3.3050003@roeck-us.net> (raw)
Hi folks,
building mips images with a consistent infrastructure is becoming more and more difficult.
Current state is as follows.
Binutils/ 2.22 2.24 2.25
Kernel
3.2 X - -
3.4 X - -
3.10 X X -
3.14 X X -
3.16 X X -
3.18 X X (X) [1]
4.1 X X (X)
4.4 X X (X)
4.5 X X (X)
4.6 X X (X)
next - X (X)
[1] (at least) allnoconfig fails to build with binutils 2.25 (2.25.1, more specifically).
I used the following toolchains for the above tests:
- Poky 1.3 (binutils 2.22)
- Poky 2.0 (binutils 2.25.1)
- gcc-4.6.3-nolibc from kernel.org (binutils 2.22)
- gcc-4.9.0-nolibc from kernel.org (binutils 2.24)
For 3.4 and 3.2 kernels to build with binutils v2.24, it would be necessary to
apply patch c02263063362 ("MIPS: Refactor 'clear_page' and 'copy_page' functions").
It applies cleanly to 3.4, but has a Makefile conflict in 3.2. It might
make sense to apply this patch to both releases. Would this be possible ?
This way, we would have at least one toolchain which can build all 3.2+ kernels.
Thanks,
Guenter
next reply other threads:[~2016-05-16 2:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-05-16 2:56 Guenter Roeck [this message]
2016-05-20 13:21 ` Building older mips kernels with different versions of binutils; possible patch for 3.2 and 3.4 Maciej W. Rozycki
2016-05-20 17:31 ` Guenter Roeck
2016-05-20 18:29 ` Maciej W. Rozycki
2016-05-20 23:18 ` James Hogan
2017-10-08 18:12 ` Ben Hutchings
2017-10-08 18:49 ` Guenter Roeck
2017-10-08 19:01 ` Guenter Roeck
2017-10-08 19:54 ` Ben Hutchings
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=573936E3.3050003@roeck-us.net \
--to=linux@roeck-us.net \
--cc=ben@decadent.org.uk \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mips@linux-mips.org \
--cc=lizefan@huawei.com \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).