linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>
To: stable <stable@vger.kernel.org>,
	Linux MIPS Mailing List <linux-mips@linux-mips.org>,
	Ben Hutchings <ben@decadent.org.uk>,
	Li Zefan <lizefan@huawei.com>,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Building older mips kernels with different versions of binutils; possible patch for 3.2 and 3.4
Date: Sun, 15 May 2016 19:56:35 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <573936E3.3050003@roeck-us.net> (raw)

Hi folks,

building mips images with a consistent infrastructure is becoming more and more difficult.
Current state is as follows.

Binutils/	2.22	2.24	2.25
Kernel
3.2		X	-	-
3.4		X	-	-
3.10		X	X	-
3.14		X	X	-
3.16		X	X	-
3.18		X	X	(X) [1]
4.1		X	X	(X)
4.4		X	X	(X)
4.5		X	X	(X)
4.6		X	X	(X)
next		-	X	(X)

[1] (at least) allnoconfig fails to build with binutils 2.25 (2.25.1, more specifically).

I used the following toolchains for the above tests:
- Poky 1.3 (binutils 2.22)
- Poky 2.0 (binutils 2.25.1)
- gcc-4.6.3-nolibc from kernel.org (binutils 2.22)
- gcc-4.9.0-nolibc from kernel.org (binutils 2.24)

For 3.4 and 3.2 kernels to build with binutils v2.24, it would be necessary to
apply patch c02263063362 ("MIPS: Refactor 'clear_page' and 'copy_page' functions").
It applies cleanly to 3.4, but has a Makefile conflict in 3.2. It might
make sense to apply this patch to both releases. Would this be possible ?
This way, we would have at least one toolchain which can build all 3.2+ kernels.

Thanks,
Guenter

             reply	other threads:[~2016-05-16  2:57 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-05-16  2:56 Guenter Roeck [this message]
2016-05-20 13:21 ` Building older mips kernels with different versions of binutils; possible patch for 3.2 and 3.4 Maciej W. Rozycki
2016-05-20 17:31   ` Guenter Roeck
2016-05-20 18:29     ` Maciej W. Rozycki
2016-05-20 23:18     ` James Hogan
2017-10-08 18:12 ` Ben Hutchings
2017-10-08 18:49   ` Guenter Roeck
2017-10-08 19:01     ` Guenter Roeck
2017-10-08 19:54       ` Ben Hutchings

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=573936E3.3050003@roeck-us.net \
    --to=linux@roeck-us.net \
    --cc=ben@decadent.org.uk \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mips@linux-mips.org \
    --cc=lizefan@huawei.com \
    --cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).