linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Tony Makkiel <tony.makkiel@daqri.com>
To: Jacek Anaszewski <j.anaszewski@samsung.com>
Cc: Linux LED Subsystem <linux-leds@vger.kernel.org>,
	Stas Sergeev <stsp@users.sourceforge.net>,
	Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz>, lkml <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Brightness control irrespective of blink state.
Date: Mon, 16 May 2016 14:43:17 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <5739CE75.80608@daqri.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <57399129.3020602@samsung.com>



On 16/05/16 10:21, Jacek Anaszewski wrote:
> Hi Tony,
>
> On 05/13/2016 04:20 PM, Tony Makkiel wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 12/05/16 11:26, Jacek Anaszewski wrote:
>>> On 05/11/2016 03:42 PM, Tony Makkiel wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On 11/05/16 10:41, Jacek Anaszewski wrote:
>>>>> On 05/10/2016 06:55 PM, Tony Makkiel wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On 10/05/16 14:26, Jacek Anaszewski wrote:
>>>>>>> On 05/10/2016 11:36 AM, Tony Makkiel wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On 09/05/16 15:45, Jacek Anaszewski wrote:
>>>>>>>>> Hi Tony,
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On 05/09/2016 03:27 PM, Tony Makkiel wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> Hi Jacek,
>>>>>>>>>>      Thank you for getting back. I updated my kernel to 4.5 and
>>>>>>>>>> have
>>>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>>> updated "led_set_brightness" now.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> It sets
>>>>>>>>>>          led_cdev->flags |= LED_BLINK_BRIGHTNESS_CHANGE;
>>>>>>>>>>          led_cdev->blink_brightness = brightness;
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>      The new implementation requires hardware specific drivers to
>>>>>>>>>> poll
>>>>>>>>>> for flag change. Shouldn't the led-core driver be calling the
>>>>>>>>>> hardware
>>>>>>>>>> specific brightness_set (led_set_brightness_nosleep)
>>>>>>>>>> irrespective of
>>>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>>> blink settings?
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Unfortunately, it place additional requirement on drivers, to
>>>>>>>>>> implement
>>>>>>>>>> a polling mechanism which won't be needed otherwise. Why are the
>>>>>>>>>> brightness calls dependent on blink settings?
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> If your question is still:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> "Is there a reason for rejecting brightness change requests when
>>>>>>>>> either of the blink_delays are set?"
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> then the answer is: yes, brightness setting is deferred until
>>>>>>>>> the next timer tick to avoid avoid problems in case we are called
>>>>>>>>> from hard irq context. It should work fine for software blinking.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Sorry, was focused debugging 'hardware accelerated blink' on the
>>>>>>>> driver
>>>>>>>> I am working on, I missed the software blinking implementation.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Nonetheless, your question, made it obvious that we have a problem
>>>>>>>>> here in case of hardware accelerated blinking, i.e. drivers that
>>>>>>>>> implement blink_set op. Is this your use case?
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Yes, the brightness requests from user space
>>>>>>>> (/sys/class/leds/*/brightness) does not get passed to hardware
>>>>>>>> specific
>>>>>>>> driver via the blink_set implemented, unless led_cdev->flags is
>>>>>>>> polled.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Anyway, I've noticed a discrepancy between the LED core code and
>>>>>>>>> both Documentation/leds/leds-class.txt and comment over
>>>>>>>>> blink_set() op
>>>>>>>>> in include/linux/leds.h, which say that blinking is deactivated
>>>>>>>>> upon setting the brightness again. Many drivers apply this rule.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> In effect, LED_BLINK_BRIGHTNESS_CHANGE will have to be removed,
>>>>>>>>> and your question will be groundless, as changing the blink
>>>>>>>>> brightness should be impossible by design.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> In my opinion, disabling blink, when brightness change requested
>>>>>>>> doesn't
>>>>>>>> sound like the right thing to do. There could be cases in which the
>>>>>>>> brightness of the blinking LED needs to be changed.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> It could be accomplished with following sequence:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> $ echo LED_FULL > brightness //set brightness
>>>>>>> $ echo "timer" > trigger     //enable blinking with
>>>>>>> brightness=LED_FULL
>>>>>>> $ echo 1 > brightness        //stop blinking and set brightness to 1
>>>>>>> $ echo "timer" > trigger     //enable blinking with brightness=1
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> The only drawback here would be interfered blinking rhythm while
>>>>>>> resetting blink brightness. Most drivers that implement blink_set
>>>>>>> op observe what documentation says and disable blinking when
>>>>>>> new brightness is set. Unfortunately, led_set_brightness() after
>>>>>>> modifications doesn't take into account drivers that implement
>>>>>>> blink_set op. It needs to be fixed, i.e. made compatible with
>>>>>>> the docs.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Maybe we can let the
>>>>>>>> hardware driver deal with the blink request if it has implemented
>>>>>>>> brightness_set? The change below seem to work.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Subject: [PATCH] led-core: Use hardware blink when available
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> At present hardware implemented brightness is not called
>>>>>>>> if blink delays are set.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Signed-off-by: Tony Makkiel <tony.makkiel@daqri.com>
>>>>>>>> ---
>>>>>>>>   drivers/leds/led-core.c | 4 +++-
>>>>>>>>   1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> diff --git a/drivers/leds/led-core.c b/drivers/leds/led-core.c
>>>>>>>> index 19e1e60d..02dd0f6 100644
>>>>>>>> --- a/drivers/leds/led-core.c
>>>>>>>> +++ b/drivers/leds/led-core.c
>>>>>>>> @@ -208,8 +208,10 @@ void led_set_brightness(struct led_classdev
>>>>>>>> *led_cdev,
>>>>>>>>       /*
>>>>>>>>        * In case blinking is on delay brightness setting
>>>>>>>>        * until the next timer tick.
>>>>>>>> +     * Or if brightness_set is defined, use the associated
>>>>>>>> implementation.
>>>>>>>>        */
>>>>>>>> -    if (led_cdev->blink_delay_on || led_cdev->blink_delay_off) {
>>>>>>>> +    if ((!led_cdev->brightness_set) &&
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> s/brightness_set/blink_set/ AFAICT
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> It wouldn't cover all cases as the fact that a driver implements
>>>>>>> blink_set doesn't necessarily mean that hardware blinking is used
>>>>>>> for current blinking parameters. There are drivers that resort to
>>>>>>> using software fallback in case the LED controller device doesn't
>>>>>>> support requested blink intervals.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I'm planning on addition of a LED_BLINKING_HW flag, that would
>>>>>>> be set after successful execution of blink_set op. It would allow to
>>>>>>> distinguish between hardware and software blinking modes reliably.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Did you mean something like
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> diff --git a/drivers/leds/led-core.c b/drivers/leds/led-core.c
>>>>>> index 19e1e60d..4a8b46d 100644
>>>>>> --- a/drivers/leds/led-core.c
>>>>>> +++ b/drivers/leds/led-core.c
>>>>>> @@ -210,6 +210,13 @@ void led_set_brightness(struct led_classdev
>>>>>> *led_cdev,
>>>>>>           * until the next timer tick.
>>>>>>           */
>>>>>>          if (led_cdev->blink_delay_on || led_cdev->blink_delay_off) {
>>>>>> +               if (led_cdev->brightness_set)
>>>>>> +                       led_set_brightness_nosleep(led_cdev,
>>>>>> brightness);
>>>>>
>>>>> brightness_set is always initialized, probably you meant blink_set.
>>>>
>>>> Your solution from your last comment below sounds better (so probably
>>>> can skip reading this section).
>>>>
>>>> But no, It was not a mistake. Actually, copied from
>>>> 'led_set_brightness_nopm' in case to protect from any drivers which
>>>> doesn't define it. The change should follow existing architecture, and
>>>> was hoping to work for both existing and new drivers.
>>>
>>> Right, brightness_set can remain uninitialized while
>>> brightness_set_blocking is provided.
>>>
>>>> Existing Chip drivers:  Note, the added brightness_set is called only
>>>> when the blink is active. The flag LED_BLINKING_HW won't be set, either
>>>> because driver is not updated to include the flag, or driver wants
>>>> software fallback to deal with it. The problems I can think of is
>>>>
>>>> -  the software flow will also call brightness_set later when the task
>>>> is serviced. But that is with the same values. So shouldn't make
>>>> difference to the user.
>>>>
>>>> New Drivers with brightness support while blinking:- They set
>>>> brightness
>>>> and the flag. They wont need the software fallback. If for any reason
>>>> brightness couldn't be set, flag is not set and normal procedure
>>>> applies. Again problem I see here is
>>>>
>>>> -    Additional responsibility on chip drivers to set the flag, if
>>>
>>> Ah, now I understand your approach.
>>>
>>>> successfully managed to set brightness while blink is active. This
>>>> shouldn't be a problem on new drivers, as they might just set the flag
>>>> every time brightness change is requested, irrespective of blink
>>>> settings. If they don't set the flag, it falls back to the software
>>>> flow
>>>> as in existing architecture.
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>> +
>>>>>> +               if (led_cdev->flags & LED_BLINKING_HW) {
>>>>>> +                       led_cdev->flags &= ~LED_BLINKING_HW;
>>>>>> +                       return;
>>>>>> +               }
>>>>>
>>>>> The dependencies are quite versatile if we wanted to properly
>>>>> implement
>>>>> what documentation claims. Setting brightness to any value while
>>>>> blinking is on should stop blinking. It was so before the commit:
>>>>>
>>>>> 76931edd5 ('leds: fix brightness changing when software blinking is
>>>>> active')
>>>>>
>>>>> The problem was that timer trigger remained active after stopping
>>>>> blinking, which led us to changing the semantics on new brightness
>>>>> set, rather than solving the problem with unregistered trigger.
>>>>> This was also against documentation claims, which was overlooked.
>>>>>
>>>>> I tried yesterday to deactivate trigger on brightness set
>>>>> executed during blinking, but there are circular dependencies,
>>>>> since led_set_brightness(led_cdev, LED_OFF) is called on deactivation.
>>>>> It is also called from led_trigger_set in the trigger removal path.
>>>>> Generally it seems non-trivial to enforce current documentation claims
>>>>> in case of software blinking.
>>>>>
>>>>> The easiest thing to do now would be changing the semantics, so that
>>>>> only setting brightness to LED_OFF would disable the trigger, which
>>>>> in fact is true since few releases. The problem is that many drivers
>>>>> that implement hardware blinking resets it on any brightness change.
>>>>> We would have to left them intact, but apply a new semantics in the
>>>>> LED core, that would allow for new drivers to just update hardware
>>>>> blinking brightness upon updating the brightness.
>>>>>
>>>>> If we followed this path then the LED_BLINKING_HW flag would have to
>>>>> be set in led_blink_setup() after blink_set op returns 0. Thanks to
>>>>> that, we could distinguish in led_set_brightness whether hardware
>>>>> or software blinking is enabled. For !LED_BLINKING_HW case we would
>>>>> proceed as currently, i.e. set the LED_BLINK_BRIGHTNESS_CHANGE flag
>>>>> and defer brightness setting until next timer tick. For the opposite
>>>>> case we wouldn't do anything and let the led_set_brightness_nosleep()
>>>>> to call the appropriate brightness_set/brightness_set_blocking op.
>>>>> Old drivers would proceed as currently, by disabling blinking
>>>>> on brightness change, and new ones could apply new semantics by
>>>>> changing brightness but leaving hardware blinking active.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> This sounds better as we do not have to rely on drivers to set the flag
>>>> and does not have the problems mentioned above. I tried the following
>>>> and works for my set up :) .
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> diff --git a/drivers/leds/led-core.c b/drivers/leds/led-core.c
>>>> index 19e1e60d..3698b67 100644
>>>> --- a/drivers/leds/led-core.c
>>>> +++ b/drivers/leds/led-core.c
>>>> @@ -141,8 +141,10 @@ static void led_blink_setup(struct led_classdev
>>>> *led_cdev,
>>>>   {
>>>>          if (!(led_cdev->flags & LED_BLINK_ONESHOT) &&
>>>>              led_cdev->blink_set &&
>>>> -           !led_cdev->blink_set(led_cdev, delay_on, delay_off))
>>>> +           !led_cdev->blink_set(led_cdev, delay_on, delay_off)){
>>>> +               led_cdev->flags |= LED_BLINKING_HW;
>>>>                  return;
>>>> +       }
>>>>
>>>>          /* blink with 1 Hz as default if nothing specified */
>>>>          if (!*delay_on && !*delay_off)
>>>> @@ -209,7 +211,8 @@ void led_set_brightness(struct led_classdev
>>>> *led_cdev,
>>>>           * In case blinking is on delay brightness setting
>>>>           * until the next timer tick.
>>>>           */
>>>> -       if (led_cdev->blink_delay_on || led_cdev->blink_delay_off) {
>>>> +       if (!(led_cdev->flags & LED_BLINKING_HW) &&
>>>> +           (led_cdev->blink_delay_on || led_cdev->blink_delay_off)) {
>>>>                  /*
>>>>                   * If we need to disable soft blinking delegate
>>>> this to
>>>> the
>>>>                   * work queue task to avoid problems in case we are
>>>> called
>>>
>>> We would have to also clear the flag upon blink deactivation, i.e.
>>> when brightness to be set equals LED_OFF. Existing drivers that
>>> implement blink_set op and deactivate blinking on any brightness set
>>> would have to be modified to clear the LED_BLINKING_HW flag in their
>>> brightness_{set|set_blocking} ops.
>>>
>>
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/leds/led-core.c b/drivers/leds/led-core.c
>> index 19e1e60d..7a15035 100644
>> --- a/drivers/leds/led-core.c
>> +++ b/drivers/leds/led-core.c
>> @@ -98,6 +98,9 @@ static void set_brightness_delayed(struct work_struct
>> *ws)
>>
>> led_cdev->delayed_set_value);
>>          else
>>                  ret = -ENOTSUPP;
>> +
>> +       if (led_cdev->delayed_set_value == LED_OFF)
>> +               led_cdev->flags &= ~LED_BLINKING_HW;
>>          if (ret < 0)
>>                  dev_err(led_cdev->dev,
>>                          "Setting an LED's brightness failed (%d)\n",
>> ret);
>> @@ -141,8 +144,10 @@ static void led_blink_setup(struct led_classdev
>> *led_cdev,
>>   {
>>          if (!(led_cdev->flags & LED_BLINK_ONESHOT) &&
>>              led_cdev->blink_set &&
>> -           !led_cdev->blink_set(led_cdev, delay_on, delay_off))
>> +           !led_cdev->blink_set(led_cdev, delay_on, delay_off)){
>> +               led_cdev->flags |= LED_BLINKING_HW;
>>                  return;
>> +       }
>>
>>          /* blink with 1 Hz as default if nothing specified */
>>          if (!*delay_on && !*delay_off)
>> @@ -209,7 +214,8 @@ void led_set_brightness(struct led_classdev
>> *led_cdev,
>>           * In case blinking is on delay brightness setting
>>           * until the next timer tick.
>>           */
>> -       if (led_cdev->blink_delay_on || led_cdev->blink_delay_off) {
>> +       if (!(led_cdev->flags & LED_BLINKING_HW) &&
>> +           (led_cdev->blink_delay_on || led_cdev->blink_delay_off)) {
>>                  /*
>>                   * If we need to disable soft blinking delegate this to
>> the
>>                   * work queue task to avoid problems in case we are
>> called
>> @@ -235,6 +241,8 @@ void led_set_brightness_nopm(struct led_classdev
>> *led_cdev,
>>          /* Use brightness_set op if available, it is guaranteed not to
>> sleep */
>>          if (led_cdev->brightness_set) {
>>                  led_cdev->brightness_set(led_cdev, value);
>> +               if (value == LED_OFF)
>> +                       led_cdev->flags &= ~LED_BLINKING_HW;
>>                  return;
>>          }
>>
>> @@ -267,6 +275,9 @@ int led_set_brightness_sync(struct led_classdev
>> *led_cdev,
>>          if (led_cdev->flags & LED_SUSPENDED)
>>                  return 0;
>>
>> +       if (value == LED_OFF)
>> +               led_cdev->flags &= ~LED_BLINKING_HW;
>> +
>>          if (led_cdev->brightness_set_blocking)
>>                  return led_cdev->brightness_set_blocking(led_cdev,
>>
>> led_cdev->brightness);
>> diff --git a/include/linux/leds.h b/include/linux/leds.h
>> index bc1476f..f5fa566 100644
>> --- a/include/linux/leds.h
>> +++ b/include/linux/leds.h
>> @@ -48,6 +48,7 @@ struct led_classdev {
>>   #define LED_BLINK_DISABLE      (1 << 21)
>>   #define LED_SYSFS_DISABLE      (1 << 22)
>>   #define LED_DEV_CAP_FLASH      (1 << 23)
>> +#define LED_BLINKING_HW        (1 << 24)
>>
>>          /* Set LED brightness level */
>>          /* Must not sleep, use a workqueue if needed */
>> ~
>>
>>
>>>> diff --git a/include/linux/leds.h b/include/linux/leds.h
>>>> index bc1476f..f5fa566 100644
>>>> --- a/include/linux/leds.h
>>>> +++ b/include/linux/leds.h
>>>> @@ -48,6 +48,7 @@ struct led_classdev {
>>>>   #define LED_BLINK_DISABLE      (1 << 21)
>>>>   #define LED_SYSFS_DISABLE      (1 << 22)
>>>>   #define LED_DEV_CAP_FLASH      (1 << 23)
>>>> +#define LED_BLINKING_HW        (1 << 24)
>>>>
>>>>          /* Set LED brightness level */
>>>>          /* Must not sleep, use a workqueue if needed */
>>>>
>>>>> I wonder if it would be safe to rely on timer_pending() instead of
>>>>> introducing LED_BLINKING_HW flag...
>>>>>
>>>> How would that work? I am assuming this has something to do with
>>>> software blink? Does it take hardware blink to account?
>>>
>>> This way we could distinguish between software and hardware blinking.
>>> It wouldn't require modifications in drivers:
>>>
>>> -       if (led_cdev->blink_delay_on || led_cdev->blink_delay_off) {
>>> +       if (timer_pending(&led_cdev->blink_timer) &&
>>> +           (led_cdev->blink_delay_on || led_cdev->blink_delay_off)) {
>>>                   /*
>>>                    * If we need to disable soft blinking delegate this
>>>
>>> It'd must be verified however if it isn't possible that
>>> led_set_brightness is called when timer is already expired,
>>> between two ticks.
>>
>> if blink_set is successful, would work without problem,
>>
>> When blink_set successful : The timer wont be triggered resulting the
>> function to return null all the time. --> No problem here
>>
>> Software blink : I do not have hardware to actually test this case. I
>> tried simulating the case.But going through the code. Following are my
>> understanding.
>
> You can test it by leaving blink_set op uninitialized in your driver.
>
>>
>> Timer Active (Most of the time) : Work as normal. --> No problem here
>>
>> Timer Expired :led_set_brightness_nopm called.
>> - Case in which brightness == LED_OFF, LED will be turned off.
>> led_cdev->blink_delay_on and delay_off will retain its value. The timer
>> will keep on running. So it will re-enable back blink. --> LED_OFF will
>> be ignored.
>>
>> - Case in which brightness != LED_OFF, new brightness set and resume
>> normal operation.  --> No problem here
>>
>
> Thanks for this analysis. I have a new idea - wouldn't it be more robust
> if we added LED_BLINKING_SW flag and set it in led_set_software_blink()?
>
> The line
>
> if (led_cdev->blink_delay_on || led_cdev->blink_delay_off)
>
> in led_set_brightness() could be then changed to
>
> if (led_cdev->flags & LED_BLINK_SW) .
>
> LED_BLINK_SW flag would have to be cleared in led_stop_software_blink()
> and in the first two conditions in the led_timer_function().
>

Yes, that will do with minimal changes. I tested the following, and works.

Date: Mon, 16 May 2016 14:18:42 +0100
Subject: [PATCH 1/1]  Allow chip-driver to set brightness if, software 
blink not used.

If software blink were active any brightness change request
  were not sent to the chip driver.

Signed-off-by: Tony Makkiel <tony.makkiel@daqri.com>
---
  drivers/leds/led-core.c | 7 +++++--
  include/linux/leds.h    | 1 +
  2 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/leds/led-core.c b/drivers/leds/led-core.c
index 19e1e60d..376b5ea 100644
--- a/drivers/leds/led-core.c
+++ b/drivers/leds/led-core.c
@@ -33,11 +33,12 @@ static void led_timer_function(unsigned long data)

  	if (!led_cdev->blink_delay_on || !led_cdev->blink_delay_off) {
  		led_set_brightness_nosleep(led_cdev, LED_OFF);
+		led_cdev->flags &= ~LED_BLINKING_SW;
  		return;
  	}

  	if (led_cdev->flags & LED_BLINK_ONESHOT_STOP) {
-		led_cdev->flags &= ~LED_BLINK_ONESHOT_STOP;
+		led_cdev->flags &= ~(LED_BLINK_ONESHOT_STOP | LED_BLINKING_SW);
  		return;
  	}

@@ -131,6 +132,7 @@ static void led_set_software_blink(struct 
led_classdev *led_cdev,
  		return;
  	}

+	led_cdev->flags |= LED_BLINKING_SW;
  	mod_timer(&led_cdev->blink_timer, jiffies + 1);
  }

@@ -199,6 +201,7 @@ void led_stop_software_blink(struct led_classdev 
*led_cdev)
  	del_timer_sync(&led_cdev->blink_timer);
  	led_cdev->blink_delay_on = 0;
  	led_cdev->blink_delay_off = 0;
+	led_cdev->flags &= ~LED_BLINKING_SW;
  }
  EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(led_stop_software_blink);

@@ -209,7 +212,7 @@ void led_set_brightness(struct led_classdev *led_cdev,
  	 * In case blinking is on delay brightness setting
  	 * until the next timer tick.
  	 */
-	if (led_cdev->blink_delay_on || led_cdev->blink_delay_off) {
+	if (led_cdev->flags & LED_BLINKING_SW) {
  		/*
  		 * If we need to disable soft blinking delegate this to the
  		 * work queue task to avoid problems in case we are called
diff --git a/include/linux/leds.h b/include/linux/leds.h
index bc1476f..08ef6f4 100644
--- a/include/linux/leds.h
+++ b/include/linux/leds.h
@@ -48,6 +48,7 @@ struct led_classdev {
  #define LED_BLINK_DISABLE	(1 << 21)
  #define LED_SYSFS_DISABLE	(1 << 22)
  #define LED_DEV_CAP_FLASH	(1 << 23)
+#define LED_BLINKING_SW 	(1 << 24)

  	/* Set LED brightness level */
  	/* Must not sleep, use a workqueue if needed */
-- 
1.9.1




>>
>>>
>>>>>>                  /*
>>>>>>                   * If we need to disable soft blinking delegate
>>>>>> this to
>>>>>> the
>>>>>>                   * work queue task to avoid problems in case we are
>>>>>> called
>>>>>> diff --git a/include/linux/leds.h b/include/linux/leds.h
>>>>>> index bc1476f..f5fa566 100644
>>>>>> --- a/include/linux/leds.h
>>>>>> +++ b/include/linux/leds.h
>>>>>> @@ -48,6 +48,7 @@ struct led_classdev {
>>>>>>   #define LED_BLINK_DISABLE      (1 << 21)
>>>>>>   #define LED_SYSFS_DISABLE      (1 << 22)
>>>>>>   #define LED_DEV_CAP_FLASH      (1 << 23)
>>>>>> +#define LED_BLINKING_HW        (1 << 24)
>>>>>>
>>>>>>          /* Set LED brightness level */
>>>>>>          /* Must not sleep, use a workqueue if needed */
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> +        (led_cdev->blink_delay_on || led_cdev->blink_delay_off)) {
>>>>>>>>           /*
>>>>>>>>            * If we need to disable soft blinking delegate this to
>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>            * work queue task to avoid problems in case we are
>>>>>>>> called
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe
>>>> linux-leds" in
>>>> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
>>>> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>
>

  reply	other threads:[~2016-05-16 13:43 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-04-28 22:03 [PATCH v3 0/3] Extend the LED panic trigger Ezequiel Garcia
2016-04-28 22:03 ` [PATCH v3 1/3] leds: triggers: Allow to switch the trigger to "panic" on a kernel panic Ezequiel Garcia
2016-04-29  7:20   ` Jacek Anaszewski
2016-05-06  9:03     ` Jacek Anaszewski
2016-05-06 13:05       ` Ezequiel Garcia
     [not found]         ` <572CE1B0.8040001@daqri.com>
     [not found]           ` <572CE715.6060504@gmail.com>
     [not found]             ` <57309039.3060305@daqri.com>
     [not found]               ` <5730A293.9050209@samsung.com>
     [not found]                 ` <5731ABB6.10607@daqri.com>
     [not found]                   ` <5731E194.1010004@samsung.com>
     [not found]                     ` <57321299.8090603@daqri.com>
2016-05-11  9:41                       ` Brightness control irrespective of blink state Jacek Anaszewski
2016-05-11 13:42                         ` Tony Makkiel
2016-05-12 10:26                           ` Jacek Anaszewski
2016-05-13 14:20                             ` Tony Makkiel
2016-05-16  9:21                               ` Jacek Anaszewski
2016-05-16 13:43                                 ` Tony Makkiel [this message]
2016-05-16 14:23                                   ` Jacek Anaszewski
2016-05-16 14:32                                     ` Jacek Anaszewski
2016-04-28 22:03 ` [PATCH v3 2/3] devicetree: leds: Introduce "panic-indicator" optional property Ezequiel Garcia
2016-04-28 22:03 ` [PATCH v3 3/3] leds: gpio: Support the "panic-indicator" firmware property Ezequiel Garcia
2016-05-03 16:53   ` Rob Herring
2016-04-28 22:22 ` [PATCH v3 0/3] Extend the LED panic trigger Pavel Machek
2016-04-29 18:57 ` Matthias Brugger

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=5739CE75.80608@daqri.com \
    --to=tony.makkiel@daqri.com \
    --cc=j.anaszewski@samsung.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-leds@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pavel@ucw.cz \
    --cc=stsp@users.sourceforge.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).