From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S965033AbWALLQO (ORCPT ); Thu, 12 Jan 2006 06:16:14 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S965013AbWALLQO (ORCPT ); Thu, 12 Jan 2006 06:16:14 -0500 Received: from [194.67.67.195] ([194.67.67.195]:52123 "EHLO trinity.dezcom.mephi.ru") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S965033AbWALLQN (ORCPT ); Thu, 12 Jan 2006 06:16:13 -0500 Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2006 14:13:15 +0300 From: Alexander Sbitnev X-Mailer: The Bat! (v3.0.1.33) UNREG / CD5BF9353B3B7091 X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Message-ID: <575186548.20060112141315@dezcom.mephi.ru> To: Jeff Garzik CC: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re[2]: SX8 stability issue In-Reply-To: <43C55CAD.90609@pobox.com> References: <204883.20060111160652@dezcom.mephi.ru> <43C55CAD.90609@pobox.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-DEZCOM-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-DEZCOM-MailScanner-SpamCheck: not spam, SpamAssassin (score=-2.941, required 5, ALL_TRUSTED -3.30, AWL 0.36, BAYES_50 0.00) X-MailScanner-From: nwshuras@dezcom.mephi.ru Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > Well, the in-kernel sx8 driver does not use NCQ at all, so you would > have to have modified the driver to turn it on. Presumably this means > there is a bug in your modifications? Hmmm... Ok, driver doesn't care about NCQ at all, as i understood all NCQ work performed by it's firmware. Then we have just a stability issue, not directly linked to NCQ. Right? Shuras