From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1B059C43334 for ; Mon, 27 Jun 2022 13:24:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S234032AbiF0NYJ (ORCPT ); Mon, 27 Jun 2022 09:24:09 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:37542 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S236055AbiF0NYF (ORCPT ); Mon, 27 Jun 2022 09:24:05 -0400 Received: from mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com (mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com [148.163.158.5]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B5BFC6325; Mon, 27 Jun 2022 06:24:02 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pps.filterd (m0098417.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (8.17.1.5/8.17.1.5) with ESMTP id 25RCi4Ri025322; Mon, 27 Jun 2022 13:24:02 GMT DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ibm.com; h=message-id : date : mime-version : subject : to : cc : references : from : in-reply-to : content-type : content-transfer-encoding; s=pp1; bh=lufC5tvpbEMIZwaMg3c+B9iUjLptd2pJU2Q7eJyQgyE=; b=Bn9edlDVW8P9RRM7/Ri2mMZOzUN2G3mav5G3P3GYaMhLXHqcKPawUwlpUk7eg9McApFC JiAV45rkiZL6MvModJ5wYx/vS30Em9/tkMNZXMwtnplZqs75r3ie1790Vz4tP2yWanKA szvqlHJsBZ1bRNZJDxZlbifYtbpYr3t7duM4fWaCOneRU6f9ID6TlnwyPMuXvbJXqAgg Ut5gtdlTdmMX5OaLXRjlB/LBU588OiWjvGr6t16EP5AiCJhEL8I2+SP2xbbLZ9Fflo2i Jpy5hdTjSaXoSZy5yUyHzQBSb/iWLtjB7NIeohKC+dObtDoK8Jnnvgz9olh+Rijv5Ox1 dQ== Received: from pps.reinject (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (PPS) with ESMTPS id 3gyctg99qf-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Mon, 27 Jun 2022 13:24:01 +0000 Received: from m0098417.ppops.net (m0098417.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by pps.reinject (8.17.1.5/8.17.1.5) with ESMTP id 25RCixbf028286; Mon, 27 Jun 2022 13:24:01 GMT Received: from ppma04fra.de.ibm.com (6a.4a.5195.ip4.static.sl-reverse.com [149.81.74.106]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (PPS) with ESMTPS id 3gyctg99ps-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Mon, 27 Jun 2022 13:24:00 +0000 Received: from pps.filterd (ppma04fra.de.ibm.com [127.0.0.1]) by ppma04fra.de.ibm.com (8.16.1.2/8.16.1.2) with SMTP id 25RDK2Ps027811; Mon, 27 Jun 2022 13:23:58 GMT Received: from b06avi18878370.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (b06avi18878370.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com [9.149.26.194]) by ppma04fra.de.ibm.com with ESMTP id 3gwt0929gj-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Mon, 27 Jun 2022 13:23:58 +0000 Received: from d06av25.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (d06av25.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com [9.149.105.61]) by b06avi18878370.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (8.14.9/8.14.9/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id 25RDO2DV30605680 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK); Mon, 27 Jun 2022 13:24:02 GMT Received: from d06av25.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id C462E11C04A; Mon, 27 Jun 2022 13:23:55 +0000 (GMT) Received: from d06av25.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 19CDE11C052; Mon, 27 Jun 2022 13:23:55 +0000 (GMT) Received: from [9.171.84.214] (unknown [9.171.84.214]) by d06av25.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP; Mon, 27 Jun 2022 13:23:55 +0000 (GMT) Message-ID: <57573020-7702-2090-d947-4d1d72548b4f@linux.ibm.com> Date: Mon, 27 Jun 2022 15:28:23 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/91.3.0 Subject: Re: [PATCH v10 1/3] KVM: s390: ipte lock for SCA access should be contained in KVM Content-Language: en-US To: Nico Boehr , kvm@vger.kernel.org Cc: linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, borntraeger@de.ibm.com, frankja@linux.ibm.com, cohuck@redhat.com, david@redhat.com, thuth@redhat.com, imbrenda@linux.ibm.com, hca@linux.ibm.com, gor@linux.ibm.com, wintera@linux.ibm.com, seiden@linux.ibm.com References: <20220620125437.37122-1-pmorel@linux.ibm.com> <20220620125437.37122-2-pmorel@linux.ibm.com> <165605386635.8840.16705488876454527148@localhost.localdomain> From: Pierre Morel In-Reply-To: <165605386635.8840.16705488876454527148@localhost.localdomain> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-TM-AS-GCONF: 00 X-Proofpoint-ORIG-GUID: TqmcZkwRd983YEfdaFFl-QHhrsNzMsnd X-Proofpoint-GUID: NArhPbz41rHMlHnRkW5qDwh6npE7mM1f X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=baseguard engine=ICAP:2.0.205,Aquarius:18.0.883,Hydra:6.0.517,FMLib:17.11.122.1 definitions=2022-06-27_06,2022-06-24_01,2022-06-22_01 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=outbound_notspam policy=outbound score=0 mlxscore=0 clxscore=1015 impostorscore=0 lowpriorityscore=0 spamscore=0 suspectscore=0 mlxlogscore=999 malwarescore=0 adultscore=0 bulkscore=0 priorityscore=1501 phishscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.12.0-2204290000 definitions=main-2206270058 Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 6/24/22 08:57, Nico Boehr wrote: > Quoting Pierre Morel (2022-06-20 14:54:35) >> We can check if SIIF is enabled by testing the sclp_info struct >> instead of testing the sie control block eca variable. >> sclp.has_ssif is the only requirement to set ECA_SII anyway >> so we can go straight to the source for that. >> >> Signed-off-by: Pierre Morel >> Reviewed-by: Janosch Frank >> Reviewed-by: David Hildenbrand > > Reviewed-by: Nico Boehr > Thanks, Pierre -- Pierre Morel IBM Lab Boeblingen