From: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com> To: Jon Mason <jon.mason@broadcom.com> Cc: Russell King <linux@armlinux.org.uk>, Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org Subject: Re: [RFC 1/1] ARM: print MHz in /proc/cpuinfo Date: Wed, 8 Jun 2016 09:34:06 +0100 [thread overview] Message-ID: <5757D87E.2080508@arm.com> (raw) In-Reply-To: <1465333713-14339-2-git-send-email-jon.mason@broadcom.com> On 07/06/16 22:08, Jon Mason wrote: > Query the CPU core clock in the device tree to determine the core clock > speed. How do guarantee that it's the current frequency of the CPU ? It doesn't even represent the mix or max frequency, so it's incorrect. Some DTs have boot frequency in that entry. > Output this clock rate in /proc/cpuinfo to match the output > from other architectures. The output is intentionally patterned after > the x86 output, to match existing (and possibly expected) convention. > > If any errors are encountered in querying the clock (or the speed is > erroneously zero), nothing will be printed out. Thus any existing > devices that do not have CPU clocks defined in the device tree will > work as before. > What if they just don't have in DT but have DVFS support ? Also whey do we need this support when the user-space can query the CPUFreq sysfs which is more accurate and maintains the current running frequency ? -- Regards, Sudeep
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-06-08 8:34 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2016-06-07 21:08 [RFC 0/1] " Jon Mason 2016-06-07 21:08 ` [RFC 1/1] " Jon Mason 2016-06-08 8:34 ` Sudeep Holla [this message] 2016-06-08 19:31 ` Jon Mason 2016-06-09 9:09 ` Sudeep Holla 2016-06-09 17:36 ` Jon Mason 2016-06-07 22:18 ` [RFC 0/1] " Russell King - ARM Linux 2016-06-07 22:58 ` Jon Mason 2016-07-02 23:58 ` Jon Masters 2016-07-03 16:54 ` Russell King - ARM Linux 2016-07-03 18:49 ` Andrew Lunn 2016-07-03 19:10 ` Russell King - ARM Linux 2016-07-18 10:02 ` Pavel Machek
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=5757D87E.2080508@arm.com \ --to=sudeep.holla@arm.com \ --cc=jon.mason@broadcom.com \ --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \ --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \ --cc=linux@armlinux.org.uk \ --subject='Re: [RFC 1/1] ARM: print MHz in /proc/cpuinfo' \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).