From: Tomasz Nowicki <tn@semihalf.com>
To: Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@kernel.org>
Cc: arnd@arndb.de, will.deacon@arm.com, catalin.marinas@arm.com,
rafael@kernel.org, hanjun.guo@linaro.org,
Lorenzo.Pieralisi@arm.com, okaya@codeaurora.org,
jchandra@broadcom.com, robert.richter@caviumnetworks.com,
mw@semihalf.com, Liviu.Dudau@arm.com, ddaney@caviumnetworks.com,
wangyijing@huawei.com, Suravee.Suthikulpanit@amd.com,
msalter@redhat.com, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linaro-acpi@lists.linaro.org,
jcm@redhat.com, andrea.gallo@linaro.org, dhdang@apm.com,
jeremy.linton@arm.com, liudongdong3@huawei.com,
cov@codeaurora.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH V8 5/9] pci, acpi: add acpi hook to assign domain number.
Date: Wed, 8 Jun 2016 12:21:19 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5757F19F.6020200@semihalf.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20160608001559.GD4759@localhost>
Hi Bjorn,
On 08.06.2016 02:15, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> Hi Tomasz,
>
> On Mon, May 30, 2016 at 05:14:18PM +0200, Tomasz Nowicki wrote:
>> PCI core code provides a config option (CONFIG_PCI_DOMAINS_GENERIC)
>> that allows assigning the PCI bus domain number generically by
>> relying on device tree bindings, and falling back to a simple counter
>> when the respective DT properties (ie "linux,pci-domain") are not
>> specified in the host bridge device tree node.
>>
>> In a similar way, when a system is booted through ACPI, architectures
>> that are selecting CONFIG_PCI_DOMAINS_GENERIC (ie ARM64) require kernel
>> hooks to retrieve the domain number so that the PCI bus domain number
>> set-up can be handled seamlessly with DT and ACPI in generic core code
>> when CONFIG_PCI_DOMAINS_GENERIC is selected.
>>
>> Since currently it is not possible to retrieve a pointer to the PCI
>> host bridge ACPI device backing the host bridge from core PCI code
>> (which would allow retrieving the domain number in an arch agnostic
>> way through the ACPI _SEG method), an arch specific ACPI hook has to
>> be declared and implemented by all arches that rely on
>> CONFIG_PCI_DOMAINS_GENERIC to retrieve the domain number and set it
>> up in core PCI code.
>>
>> For the aforementioned reasons, this patch introduces a dummy
>> acpi_pci_bus_domain_nr() hook in preparation for per-arch implementation
>> of the same to retrieve the domain number on a per-arch basis when
>> the system boots through ACPI.
>>
>> For the sake of code clarity the current code implementing generic
>> domain number assignment (ie pci_bus_assign_domain_nr(), selected by
>> CONFIG_PCI_DOMAINS_GENERIC) is reshuffled so that the code implementing
>> the DT domain assignment function is stubbed out into a corresponding
>> helper, so that DT and ACPI functions are clearly separated in
>> preparation for arches acpi_pci_bus_domain_nr() implementations.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Tomasz Nowicki <tn@semihalf.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com>
>> ---
>> drivers/pci/pci.c | 11 +++++++++--
>> include/linux/pci.h | 1 +
>> 2 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/pci/pci.c b/drivers/pci/pci.c
>> index eb431b5..2b52178 100644
>> --- a/drivers/pci/pci.c
>> +++ b/drivers/pci/pci.c
>> @@ -7,6 +7,7 @@
>> * Copyright 1997 -- 2000 Martin Mares <mj@ucw.cz>
>> */
>>
>> +#include <linux/acpi.h>
>> #include <linux/kernel.h>
>> #include <linux/delay.h>
>> #include <linux/init.h>
>> @@ -4941,7 +4942,7 @@ int pci_get_new_domain_nr(void)
>> }
>>
>> #ifdef CONFIG_PCI_DOMAINS_GENERIC
>> -void pci_bus_assign_domain_nr(struct pci_bus *bus, struct device *parent)
>> +static int of_pci_bus_domain_nr(struct device *parent)
>
> Can we do a little cleanup before this patch?
>
> - pci_bus_assign_domain_nr() is only used inside drivers/pci, so
> maybe we move the prototype to drivers/pci/pci.h?
pci_bus_assign_domain_nr() goes with pci_domain_nr() as an option for
CONFIG_PCI_DOMAINS_GENERIC. pci_domain_nr() is used commonly outside
drivers/pci so we would need to split these calls then, thus personally
I think it would be better to keep both in inclue/linux/pci.h
>
> - I don't really like the style of calling a function that
> internally assigns bus->domain_nr. Could we do something like
> this instead?
>
> int pci_bus_domain_nr(...)
> {
> ...
> return domain;
> }
>
> ... pci_create_root_bus(...)
> {
> ...
> b->domain_nr = pci_bus_domain_nr(...);
We can. I do not see much difference between pci_bus_domain_nr() and
pci_domain_nr() which we already have so how about calling it
pci_bus_find_domain_nr instead? Lorenzo, any strong preference for it?
>
> That would be two new patches, if this makes sense.
>
> And this patch would only rename pci_bus_assign_domain_nr() to
> of_pci_bus_domain_nr() and add the pci_bus_domain_nr() wrapper.
Giving that we would keep prototypes in inclue/linux/pci.h
1. First patch would rename pci_bus_assign_domain_nr() to
pci_bus_find_domain_nr() and it would return domain number so that we
could do:
... pci_create_root_bus(...)
{
...
b->domain_nr = pci_bus_domain_nr(...);
...
}
2. Second patch would transform pci_bus_find_domain_nr() to be the
wrapper for of_pci_bus_domain_nr()
3. Third patch would add stub definition, the ARM64 definition and the
new call acpi_pci_bus_domain_nr() in pci_bus_find_domain_nr() wrapper.
Does this plan sound reasonable?
>
>> {
>> static int use_dt_domains = -1;
>> int domain = -1;
>> @@ -4985,7 +4986,13 @@ void pci_bus_assign_domain_nr(struct pci_bus *bus, struct device *parent)
>> domain = -1;
>> }
>>
>> - bus->domain_nr = domain;
>> + return domain;
>> +}
>> +
>> +void pci_bus_assign_domain_nr(struct pci_bus *bus, struct device *parent)
>> +{
>> + bus->domain_nr = acpi_disabled ? of_pci_bus_domain_nr(parent) :
>> + acpi_pci_bus_domain_nr(bus);
>> }
>> #endif
>> #endif
>> diff --git a/include/linux/pci.h b/include/linux/pci.h
>> index 12349de..bba4053 100644
>> --- a/include/linux/pci.h
>> +++ b/include/linux/pci.h
>> @@ -1390,6 +1390,7 @@ static inline int pci_domain_nr(struct pci_bus *bus)
>> {
>> return bus->domain_nr;
>> }
>> +static inline int acpi_pci_bus_domain_nr(struct pci_bus *bus) { return -1; }
>
> I would split the addition of acpi_pci_bus_domain_nr() to a separate
> patch and include the ARM64 definition in that same patch. That patch
> would only add this stub definition, the ARM64 definition, and the new
> call in pci_bus_domain_nr().
OK
Thanks,
Tomasz
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-06-08 10:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 45+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-05-30 15:14 [PATCH V8 0/9] Support for ARM64 ACPI based PCI host controller Tomasz Nowicki
2016-05-30 15:14 ` [PATCH V8 1/9] PCI: ecam: move ecam.h to linux/include/pci-ecam.h Tomasz Nowicki
2016-06-02 9:48 ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2016-05-30 15:14 ` [PATCH V8 2/9] PCI: ecam: Add parent device field to pci_config_window Tomasz Nowicki
2016-06-02 10:13 ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2016-05-30 15:14 ` [PATCH V8 3/9] pci: Add new function to unmap IO resources Tomasz Nowicki
2016-06-02 16:50 ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2016-05-30 15:14 ` [PATCH V8 4/9] acpi, pci: Support IO resources when parsing PCI host bridge resources Tomasz Nowicki
2016-06-02 17:30 ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2016-06-07 23:56 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2016-05-30 15:14 ` [PATCH V8 5/9] pci, acpi: add acpi hook to assign domain number Tomasz Nowicki
2016-06-08 0:15 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2016-06-08 10:21 ` Tomasz Nowicki [this message]
2016-06-08 13:22 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2016-06-10 15:14 ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2016-06-10 15:49 ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2016-06-10 16:49 ` Tomasz Nowicki
2016-06-10 18:18 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2016-06-10 18:54 ` Jon Masters
2016-05-30 15:14 ` [PATCH V8 6/9] arm64, pci, acpi: ACPI support for legacy IRQs parsing and consolidation with DT code Tomasz Nowicki
2016-05-30 15:14 ` [PATCH V8 7/9] acpi: Add generic MCFG table handling Tomasz Nowicki
2016-06-03 11:38 ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2016-06-06 12:55 ` Tomasz Nowicki
2016-06-08 1:56 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2016-06-08 12:21 ` Tomasz Nowicki
2016-06-08 13:17 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2016-06-08 13:44 ` Tomasz Nowicki
2016-05-30 15:14 ` [PATCH V8 8/9] arm64, pci, acpi: Provide ACPI-specific prerequisites for PCI bus enumeration Tomasz Nowicki
2016-06-02 9:45 ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2016-06-02 9:51 ` Tomasz Nowicki
2016-05-30 15:14 ` [PATCH V8 9/9] pci, acpi: ARM64 support for ACPI based generic PCI host controller Tomasz Nowicki
2016-05-30 15:38 ` Arnd Bergmann
2016-05-30 16:13 ` Jayachandran C
2016-06-02 9:35 ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2016-06-02 9:44 ` Tomasz Nowicki
2016-06-08 2:14 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2016-06-01 7:36 ` [PATCH V8 0/9] Support for ARM64 ACPI based " Gabriele Paoloni
2016-06-02 7:31 ` Jon Masters
2016-06-02 10:06 ` Gabriele Paoloni
2016-06-02 8:52 ` Tomasz Nowicki
2016-06-02 9:58 ` Gabriele Paoloni
2016-06-02 8:48 ` Jon Masters
2016-06-07 23:13 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2016-06-08 9:20 ` Dongdong Liu
2016-06-09 16:45 ` Suravee Suthikulanit
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5757F19F.6020200@semihalf.com \
--to=tn@semihalf.com \
--cc=Liviu.Dudau@arm.com \
--cc=Lorenzo.Pieralisi@arm.com \
--cc=Suravee.Suthikulpanit@amd.com \
--cc=andrea.gallo@linaro.org \
--cc=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=cov@codeaurora.org \
--cc=ddaney@caviumnetworks.com \
--cc=dhdang@apm.com \
--cc=hanjun.guo@linaro.org \
--cc=helgaas@kernel.org \
--cc=jchandra@broadcom.com \
--cc=jcm@redhat.com \
--cc=jeremy.linton@arm.com \
--cc=linaro-acpi@lists.linaro.org \
--cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=liudongdong3@huawei.com \
--cc=msalter@redhat.com \
--cc=mw@semihalf.com \
--cc=okaya@codeaurora.org \
--cc=rafael@kernel.org \
--cc=robert.richter@caviumnetworks.com \
--cc=wangyijing@huawei.com \
--cc=will.deacon@arm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).