From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752737AbcFNQrq (ORCPT ); Tue, 14 Jun 2016 12:47:46 -0400 Received: from foss.arm.com ([217.140.101.70]:60159 "EHLO foss.arm.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751356AbcFNQro (ORCPT ); Tue, 14 Jun 2016 12:47:44 -0400 Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 2/5] ACPI / processor_idle: Add support for Low Power Idle(LPI) states To: "Rafael J . Wysocki" , linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org References: <1465915719-8409-1-git-send-email-sudeep.holla@arm.com> <1465915719-8409-3-git-send-email-sudeep.holla@arm.com> Cc: Sudeep Holla , Vikas Sajjan , Sunil , Lorenzo Pieralisi , Prashanth Prakash , Al Stone , Ashwin Chaugule , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org From: Sudeep Holla Organization: ARM Message-ID: <5760352C.3000704@arm.com> Date: Tue, 14 Jun 2016 17:47:40 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.8.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <1465915719-8409-3-git-send-email-sudeep.holla@arm.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 14/06/16 15:48, Sudeep Holla wrote: > ACPI 6.0 introduced an optional object _LPI that provides an alternate > method to describe Low Power Idle states. It defines the local power > states for each node in a hierarchical processor topology. The OSPM can > use _LPI object to select a local power state for each level of processor > hierarchy in the system. They used to produce a composite power state > request that is presented to the platform by the OSPM. > > Since multiple processors affect the idle state for any non-leaf hierarchy > node, coordination of idle state requests between the processors is > required. ACPI supports two different coordination schemes: Platform > coordinated and OS initiated. > > This patch adds initial support for Platform coordination scheme of LPI. > I seem to have sent a stale version of this patch, will send an updated version of this patch alone. Please ignore this one. -- Regards, Sudeep