From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752266AbcFPHbT (ORCPT ); Thu, 16 Jun 2016 03:31:19 -0400 Received: from mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com ([148.163.158.5]:22934 "EHLO mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751246AbcFPHbQ (ORCPT ); Thu, 16 Jun 2016 03:31:16 -0400 X-IBM-Helo: d06dlp01.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com X-IBM-MailFrom: borntraeger@de.ibm.com X-IBM-RcptTo: kvm@vger.kernel.org;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] KVM: do not use kvm->online_vcpus to check "has one VCPU been created?" To: Paolo Bonzini , Cornelia Huck References: <1465824332-10628-1-git-send-email-pbonzini@redhat.com> <20160613164421.77b70bee.cornelia.huck@de.ibm.com> <26948b73-1233-8515-24ac-7557837230b2@redhat.com> Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org, Christian Borntraeger From: Christian Borntraeger Date: Thu, 16 Jun 2016 09:30:34 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.8.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <26948b73-1233-8515-24ac-7557837230b2@redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-TM-AS-MML: disable X-Content-Scanned: Fidelis XPS MAILER x-cbid: 16061607-0028-0000-0000-000001D88E09 X-IBM-AV-DETECTION: SAVI=unused REMOTE=unused XFE=unused x-cbparentid: 16061607-0029-0000-0000-00001F41EFD2 Message-Id: <5762559A.1090604@de.ibm.com> X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10432:,, definitions=2016-06-16_02:,, signatures=0 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=outbound_notspam policy=outbound score=0 spamscore=0 suspectscore=0 malwarescore=0 phishscore=0 adultscore=0 bulkscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.0.1-1604210000 definitions=main-1606160087 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 06/16/2016 12:00 AM, Paolo Bonzini wrote: > > > On 13/06/2016 16:44, Cornelia Huck wrote: >>>> arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.c | 10 +++++----- >>>> arch/x86/kvm/Kconfig | 1 - >>>> arch/x86/kvm/x86.c | 11 +++-------- >>>> include/linux/kvm_host.h | 14 ++++++++------ >>>> virt/kvm/Kconfig | 3 --- >>>> virt/kvm/kvm_main.c | 27 +++++++++++++++++---------- >>>> 6 files changed, 33 insertions(+), 33 deletions(-) >>>> >> Looks like a sane approach, only two inversions in the s390 patch :) > > So it's okay to push patch 3 to kvm/next? With the 2 fixes that Conny requested, yes. With that fixed up, Acked-by: Christian Borntraeger