From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932743AbcFTTB7 (ORCPT ); Mon, 20 Jun 2016 15:01:59 -0400 Received: from arroyo.ext.ti.com ([198.47.19.12]:34654 "EHLO arroyo.ext.ti.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753750AbcFTTBt (ORCPT ); Mon, 20 Jun 2016 15:01:49 -0400 Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/2] Add support for SYSCON reset To: Rob Herring , Philipp Zabel References: <20160601184125.20241-1-afd@ti.com> <576178C7.4040204@ti.com> <1466009144.3539.77.camel@pengutronix.de> CC: Pawel Moll , Mark Rutland , Ian Campbell , Kumar Gala , Suman Anna , "devicetree@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" From: "Andrew F. Davis" Message-ID: <5768399C.30201@ti.com> Date: Mon, 20 Jun 2016 13:44:44 -0500 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.8.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 06/15/2016 09:13 PM, Rob Herring wrote: > On Wed, Jun 15, 2016 at 11:45 AM, Philipp Zabel wrote: >> Hi Andrew, >> >> Am Mittwoch, den 15.06.2016, 10:48 -0500 schrieb Andrew F. Davis: >>> On 06/01/2016 01:41 PM, Andrew F. Davis wrote: >>>> Some SoCs contain reset controls for modules that are memory-mapped to >>>> areas shared with other module configuration settings. This requires >>>> synchronization across all drivers accessing this memory area. This >>>> series adds a generic SYSCON reset driver to allow resets toggled >>>> by bits in memory-mapped registers through SYSCON. >>>> >>>> Changes from v2: >>>> - Rebased on v4.7-rc1 >>>> - Removed the need to give reset specifier nodes an index address >>>> >>>> Changes from v1: >>>> - Reset control information is now described in the reset node, this >>>> keeps the reset information centralized for easy verification >>>> - Other small fixups >>>> >>>> Andrew F. Davis (2): >>>> Documentation: dt: reset: Add syscon reset binding >>>> reset: add a SYSCON based reset driver >>>> >>>> .../devicetree/bindings/reset/syscon-reset.txt | 105 ++++++++ >>>> drivers/reset/Kconfig | 10 + >>>> drivers/reset/Makefile | 1 + >>>> drivers/reset/reset-syscon.c | 289 +++++++++++++++++++++ >>>> include/dt-bindings/reset/syscon.h | 23 ++ >>>> 5 files changed, 428 insertions(+) >>>> create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/reset/syscon-reset.txt >>>> create mode 100644 drivers/reset/reset-syscon.c >>>> create mode 100644 include/dt-bindings/reset/syscon.h >>>> >>> >>> Is there any additional feedback for this driver? I normally try to >>> refrain from pings, but this may begin to block further upstreaming of >>> IPs that uses this reset if it can not be taken this cycle. >> >> There's still Rob's concern that this binding needs a device tree node >> per single register bit in the worst case, which seems a bit overkill. > > Yes, that's still my concern with this. > >> I'd still prefer to have this information hidden in the drivers, but if >> you absolutely have to put it in the device tree, maybe an approach more >> similar to pinctrl-simple, where you could list all resets, one per >> line, in a single property, would be more acceptable: >> >> pscrst: reset-controller { >> compatible = "ti,-pscrst", "syscon-reset"; >> >> /* syscon-reset,bits = ; */ > > ti,reset-bits > >> syscon-reset,bits = <0xa3c 8 0x83c 8 RESET_ASSERT_CLEAR /* 0: pcrst-dsp */ >> 0xa40 5 0 0 RESET_TRIGGER_SET>; /* 1: pcrst-example */ >> }; >> >> dsp0: dsp { >> resets = <&pscrst 0>; >> }; > > Otherwise, this seems okay. It is more concise. > If this is what you would both be okay with then I'll do it this way, pushing v4 in a moment. >> >>> If there is still an objection to calling this a generic reset solution >>> we would not strongly object to relabeling this to something implying >>> more TI exclusivity. >> >> Good. Right now there don't seem to be that many reset controllers in >> the wild for which this binding would be a good fit. If this turns out >> to be useful for others, we can add more compatibles to the driver. > > Certainly other users would make a generic solution more compelling. > I believe some other current reset drivers could have made use of this without having resorted to new drivers, I guess we will have to just wait to see if it gets traction with new platforms or not, before we can decide if this solution is really as general as I think it can be. Andrew