From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id S1752224AbcF2FEt (ORCPT <rfc822;w@1wt.eu>);
	Wed, 29 Jun 2016 01:04:49 -0400
Received: from LGEAMRELO12.lge.com ([156.147.23.52]:41096 "EHLO
	lgeamrelo12.lge.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
	with ESMTP id S1750873AbcF2FEs (ORCPT
	<rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
	Wed, 29 Jun 2016 01:04:48 -0400
X-Original-SENDERIP: 156.147.1.151
X-Original-MAILFROM: neidhard.kim@lge.com
X-Original-SENDERIP: 10.178.37.74
X-Original-MAILFROM: neidhard.kim@lge.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] clk: fixed-factor: add optional dt-binding clock-flags
To: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>
References: <20160621005910.GN1521@codeaurora.org>
 <1466741572-58802-1-git-send-email-neidhard.kim@lge.com>
 <20160628205518.GF3737@rob-hp-laptop>
Cc: Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@free-electrons.com>,
        Mike Turquette <mturquette@baylibre.com>,
        Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org>, linux-clk@vger.kernel.org,
        devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        Chanho Min <chanho.min@lge.com>
From: Jongsung Kim <neidhard.kim@lge.com>
Message-ID: <577356E8.30009@lge.com>
Date: Wed, 29 Jun 2016 14:04:40 +0900
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/38.8.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <20160628205518.GF3737@rob-hp-laptop>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

On 2016년 06월 29일 05:55, Rob Herring wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 24, 2016 at 01:12:52PM +0900, Jongsung Kim wrote:
>> There is no way to set additional flags for a DT-initialized fixed-
>> factor-clock, and it can be problematic i.e., when the clock rate
>> needs to be changed. [1][2]
>>
>> This patch introduces an optional dt-binding named "clock-flags" to
>> be used for passing any needed flags from dts.
> I don't think we want this in DT. If we did, the flags would need some 
> documentation about what the flags mean.
Thanks for your comment. It looks not that big deal to provide a little documentation..? Some of the flags looks safe to be removed. Thinking of only fixed-factor-clock, most of them can be removed.