linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Frank Rowand <frowand.list@gmail.com>
To: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Cc: robh+dt@kernel.org, david@gibson.dropbear.id.au,
	pantelis.antoniou@konsulko.com, stephen.boyd@linaro.org,
	grant.likely@secretlab.ca, mark.rutland@arm.com,
	mporter@konsulko.com, koen@dominion.thruhere.net,
	linux@roeck-us.net, marex@denx.de, wsa@the-dreams.de,
	devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org, panto@antoniou-consulting.com
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 0/1] Portable Device Tree Connector -- conceptual
Date: Mon, 4 Jul 2016 11:15:44 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <577AA7D0.7050402@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20160704152226.GJ6247@sirena.org.uk>

On 07/04/16 08:22, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Sat, Jul 02, 2016 at 04:55:49PM -0700, frowand.list@gmail.com wrote:
> 
>> This is an extremely simple example to illustrate the concepts.  It is not
>> meant to represent the complexity of a real board.
>>
>> To start with, assume that the device that will eventually be on a daughter
>> board is first soldered onto the mother board.  The mother board contains
>> two devices connected via bus spi_1.  One device is described in the .dts
>> file, the other is described in an included .dtsi file.
>> Then the device tree files will look like:
> 
> Can I suggest not using SPI as an example here?  It's particularly
> messy since addresses are essentially just a random signal that can be
> totally separate to the controller hardware which might be adding more
> complexity early on in building up your model than is really desirable.
> It will need to be dealt with but perhaps not right now.  I2C might be
> easier.
> 
> The initial issue with SPI is that you really need to do something like
> bring out individual slots on the bus rather than the bus as a whole
> since you're going to need a remapping layer to map chip selects on the
> module to chip selects on the host board.
> 

Yes, thank you for pointing that out.

For the purposes of the mental model, when thinking about what I wrote,
just change SPI to I2C everywhere.

-Frank

  reply	other threads:[~2016-07-04 18:16 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-07-02 23:55 [RFC PATCH 0/1] Portable Device Tree Connector -- conceptual frowand.list
2016-07-02 23:55 ` [RFC PATCH 1/1] device tree connectors, using plugs and sockets frowand.list
2016-07-03  6:06 ` [RFC PATCH 0/1] Portable Device Tree Connector -- conceptual Frank Rowand
2016-07-04 15:22 ` Mark Brown
2016-07-04 18:15   ` Frank Rowand [this message]
2016-07-05 18:01 ` Pantelis Antoniou
2016-07-06 17:40   ` Frank Rowand
2016-07-07  7:15 ` David Gibson
2016-07-08  7:26   ` Pantelis Antoniou
2016-07-08  7:43     ` David Gibson
2016-07-08 19:20     ` Frank Rowand
2016-07-08 19:25       ` Frank Rowand
2016-07-08 19:22   ` Frank Rowand

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=577AA7D0.7050402@gmail.com \
    --to=frowand.list@gmail.com \
    --cc=broonie@kernel.org \
    --cc=david@gibson.dropbear.id.au \
    --cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=grant.likely@secretlab.ca \
    --cc=koen@dominion.thruhere.net \
    --cc=linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux@roeck-us.net \
    --cc=marex@denx.de \
    --cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
    --cc=mporter@konsulko.com \
    --cc=pantelis.antoniou@konsulko.com \
    --cc=panto@antoniou-consulting.com \
    --cc=robh+dt@kernel.org \
    --cc=stephen.boyd@linaro.org \
    --cc=wsa@the-dreams.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).