From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S933163AbcIOKZp convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Thu, 15 Sep 2016 06:25:45 -0400 Received: from prv-mh.provo.novell.com ([137.65.248.74]:37804 "EHLO prv-mh.provo.novell.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755151AbcIOKZm (ORCPT ); Thu, 15 Sep 2016 06:25:42 -0400 Message-Id: <57DA9342020000780010F267@prv-mh.provo.novell.com> X-Mailer: Novell GroupWise Internet Agent 14.2.1 Date: Thu, 15 Sep 2016 04:25:38 -0600 From: "Jan Beulich" To: "David Vrabel" Cc: "Aravind Gopalakrishnan" , "Huang Rui" , "Peter Zijlstra" , "Len Brown" , "Rafael J. Wysocki" , "Andy Lutomirski" , "maintainer:X86 ARCHITECTURE 32-BIT AND 64-BIT" , "Kyle Huey" , "Thomas Gleixner" , "Alexander Shishkin" , "DaveHansen" , "Kristen Carlson Accardi" , "Srinivas Pandruvada" , "moderated list:XEN HYPERVISOR INTERFACE" , "Vladimir Zapolskiy" , "Robert O'Callahan" , "Boris Ostrovsky" , "Ingo Molnar" , "Juergen Gross" , "Borislav Petkov" , "open list:X86 ARCHITECTURE 32-BIT AND 64-BIT" , "H. PeterAnvin" Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v2 2/3] x86 Test and expose CPUID faulting capabilities in /proc/cpuinfo References: <1473886902-17902-1-git-send-email-khuey@kylehuey.com> <1473886902-17902-3-git-send-email-khuey@kylehuey.com> <57DA724E.6090606@citrix.com> In-Reply-To: <57DA724E.6090606@citrix.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT Content-Disposition: inline Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org >>> On 15.09.16 at 12:05, wrote: > On 14/09/16 22:01, Kyle Huey wrote: >> Xen advertises the underlying support for CPUID faulting but not does pass >> through writes to the relevant MSR, nor does it virtualize it, so it does >> not actually work. For now mask off the relevant bit on MSR_PLATFORM_INFO. > > Could you clarify in the commit message that it is PV guests that are > affected. What makes you think HVM ones aren't? Jan