linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Waiman Long <waiman.long@hpe.com>
To: Davidlohr Bueso <dave@stgolabs.net>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	Mike Galbraith <umgwanakikbuti@gmail.com>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>, Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>,
	<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-doc@vger.kernel.org>,
	Jason Low <jason.low2@hpe.com>,
	Scott J Norton <scott.norton@hpe.com>,
	Douglas Hatch <doug.hatch@hpe.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH -tip] locking/rtmutex: Reduce top-waiter blocking on a lock
Date: Mon, 26 Sep 2016 17:40:04 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <57E995B4.4070003@hpe.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20160924012803.GC30291@linux-80c1.suse>

On 09/23/2016 09:28 PM, Davidlohr Bueso wrote:
>
> +#ifdef CONFIG_RT_MUTEX_SPIN_ON_OWNER
> +static bool rt_mutex_spin_on_owner(struct rt_mutex *lock,
> +                   struct task_struct *owner)
> +{
> +    bool ret = true;
> +
> +    /*
> +     * The last owner could have just released the lock,
> +     * immediately try taking it again.
> +     */
> +    if (!owner)
> +        goto done;
> +
> +    rcu_read_lock();
> +    while (rt_mutex_owner(lock) == owner) {
> +        /*
> +         * Ensure we emit the owner->on_cpu, dereference _after_
> +         * checking lock->owner still matches owner. If that fails,
> +         * owner might point to freed memory. If it still matches,
> +         * the rcu_read_lock() ensures the memory stays valid.
> +         */
> +        barrier();
> +        if (!owner->on_cpu || need_resched()) {
> +            ret = false;
> +            break;
> +        }
> +
> +        cpu_relax_lowlatency();
> +    }
> +    rcu_read_unlock();
> +done:
> +    return ret;
> +}
> +

One issue that I saw is that the spinner may no longer be the top waiter 
while spinning. Should we also check this condition in the spin loop?

Cheers,
Longman

  reply	other threads:[~2016-09-26 21:40 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 35+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-09-20 13:42 [RFC PATCH v2 0/5] futex: Introducing throughput-optimized futexes Waiman Long
2016-09-20 13:42 ` [RFC PATCH v2 1/5] futex: Add futex_set_timer() helper function Waiman Long
2016-09-22 21:31   ` Thomas Gleixner
2016-09-23  0:45     ` Waiman Long
2016-09-20 13:42 ` [RFC PATCH v2 2/5] futex: Rename futex_pi_state to futex_state Waiman Long
2016-09-20 13:42 ` [RFC PATCH v2 3/5] futex: Throughput-optimized (TO) futexes Waiman Long
2016-09-21  6:59   ` Mike Galbraith
2016-09-21 23:37     ` Waiman Long
2016-09-22  7:49       ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-09-22 13:04         ` Waiman Long
2016-09-22 13:34         ` Thomas Gleixner
2016-09-22 14:41           ` Davidlohr Bueso
2016-09-22 14:46             ` Thomas Gleixner
2016-09-22 15:11               ` Davidlohr Bueso
2016-09-22 20:08                 ` Waiman Long
2016-09-22 20:28                   ` Waiman Long
2016-09-22 20:38                     ` Thomas Gleixner
2016-09-22 21:48                       ` Waiman Long
2016-09-23 13:02                         ` Thomas Gleixner
2016-09-26 22:02                           ` Waiman Long
2016-09-22 21:39                     ` Davidlohr Bueso
2016-09-22 21:41                       ` Thomas Gleixner
2016-09-22 21:59                         ` Waiman Long
2016-09-27 19:02                           ` [PATCH v2 -tip] locking/rtmutex: Reduce top-waiter blocking on a lock Davidlohr Bueso
2016-10-24 18:08                             ` Davidlohr Bueso
2016-10-24 18:48                               ` Thomas Gleixner
2016-09-24  1:28                         ` [PATCH " Davidlohr Bueso
2016-09-26 21:40                           ` Waiman Long [this message]
2016-09-22 19:56           ` [RFC PATCH v2 3/5] futex: Throughput-optimized (TO) futexes Waiman Long
2016-09-22 20:26             ` Thomas Gleixner
2016-09-22 21:13               ` Waiman Long
2016-09-22 13:23   ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-09-22 17:21     ` Waiman Long
2016-09-20 13:42 ` [RFC PATCH v2 4/5] futex: Add timeout support to TO futexes Waiman Long
2016-09-20 13:42 ` [RFC PATCH v2 5/5] futex, doc: TO futexes document Waiman Long

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=57E995B4.4070003@hpe.com \
    --to=waiman.long@hpe.com \
    --cc=corbet@lwn.net \
    --cc=dave@stgolabs.net \
    --cc=doug.hatch@hpe.com \
    --cc=jason.low2@hpe.com \
    --cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@kernel.org \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=scott.norton@hpe.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=umgwanakikbuti@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).