From: "Linux kernel regression tracking (Thorsten Leemhuis)" <email@example.com>
To: Hans de Goede <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Cc: walter59 <email@example.com>,
Adrien <firstname.lastname@example.org>, LKML <email@example.com>,
Subject: [regression] Bug 216904 - backlight brighness control with video missing /sys/class/backlight interface
Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2023 15:14:45 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <firstname.lastname@example.org> (raw)
Hi, this is your Linux kernel regression tracker.
I noticed a regression report in bugzilla.kernel.org. As many (most?)
kernel developer don't keep an eye on it, I decided to forward it by
mail. Quoting from https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=216904 :
> walter59 2023-01-09 11:31:18 UTC
> backlight brighness control with video missing /sys/class/backlight interface
> kernel 6.1 it is ok --- kernel 6.2 not
> [reply] [−] Comment 1 The Linux kernel's regression tracker (Thorsten Leemhuis) 2023-01-10 06:24:45 UTC
> What kind of machine is this? Could you please attach the output of `lspci -nn` and `dmidecode`
> [reply] [−] Comment 2 Adrien 2023-01-11 21:47:24 UTC
> Same here. Everything is fine on 6.1.3 and the issue seems to happen starting 6.1.4.
> `ls /sys/class/backlight/` returns nothing.
> I can't adjust the brightness with Fn+F3/F4 (dmesg returns acer_wmi: Unknown function number - 4 - 0).
> I'll try to do a bisect.
See the ticket for more details.
[TLDR for the rest of this mail: I'm adding this report to the list of
tracked Linux kernel regressions; the text you find below is based on a
few templates paragraphs you might have encountered already in similar
BTW, let me use this mail to also add the report to the list of tracked
regressions to ensure it's doesn't fall through the cracks:
#regzbot introduced: v6.1..v6.2-rc4
#regzbot title: brightness: /sys/class/backlight interface is missing
(in 6.1.3->6.1.4, too?)
This isn't a regression? This issue or a fix for it are already
discussed somewhere else? It was fixed already? You want to clarify when
the regression started to happen? Or point out I got the title or
something else totally wrong? Then just reply and tell me -- ideally
while also telling regzbot about it, as explained by the page listed in
the footer of this mail.
Developers: When fixing the issue, remember to add 'Link:' tags pointing
to the report (e.g. the buzgzilla ticket and maybe this mail as well, if
this thread sees some discussion). See page linked in footer for details.
Ciao, Thorsten (wearing his 'the Linux kernel's regression tracker' hat)
Everything you wanna know about Linux kernel regression tracking:
If I did something stupid, please tell me, as explained on that page.
next reply other threads:[~2023-01-12 14:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-01-12 14:14 Linux kernel regression tracking (Thorsten Leemhuis) [this message]
2023-02-17 12:16 ` [regression] Bug 216904 - backlight brighness control with video missing /sys/class/backlight interface Linux regression tracking #update (Thorsten Leemhuis)
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).