From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 smtp.codeaurora.org 729EA6063F Authentication-Results: pdx-caf-mail.web.codeaurora.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=intel.com Authentication-Results: pdx-caf-mail.web.codeaurora.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932456AbeFFIEE (ORCPT + 25 others); Wed, 6 Jun 2018 04:04:04 -0400 Received: from mga05.intel.com ([192.55.52.43]:29180 "EHLO mga05.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932304AbeFFID7 (ORCPT ); Wed, 6 Jun 2018 04:03:59 -0400 X-Amp-Result: SKIPPED(no attachment in message) X-Amp-File-Uploaded: False X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.49,482,1520924400"; d="scan'208";a="60791403" Subject: Re: [PATCH V3 02/17] kallsyms, x86: Export addresses of syscall trampolines To: Andi Kleen Cc: Thomas Gleixner , Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo , Ingo Molnar , Peter Zijlstra , Andy Lutomirski , "H. Peter Anvin" , Alexander Shishkin , Dave Hansen , Joerg Roedel , Jiri Olsa , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, x86@kernel.org References: <1526986485-6562-1-git-send-email-adrian.hunter@intel.com> <1526986485-6562-3-git-send-email-adrian.hunter@intel.com> <20180605160043.GC7220@tassilo.jf.intel.com> From: Adrian Hunter Organization: Intel Finland Oy, Registered Address: PL 281, 00181 Helsinki, Business Identity Code: 0357606 - 4, Domiciled in Helsinki Message-ID: <57f1e61f-49fa-99be-6876-48775272ccec@intel.com> Date: Wed, 6 Jun 2018 11:02:08 +0300 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.7.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20180605160043.GC7220@tassilo.jf.intel.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 05/06/18 19:00, Andi Kleen wrote: >> +#ifdef CONFIG_X86_64 >> +int arch_get_kallsym(unsigned int symnum, unsigned long *value, char *type, >> + char *name) >> +{ >> + unsigned int cpu, ncpu; >> + >> + if (symnum >= num_possible_cpus()) >> + return -EINVAL; >> + >> + for (cpu = cpumask_first(cpu_possible_mask), ncpu = 0; >> + cpu < num_possible_cpus() && ncpu < symnum; >> + cpu = cpumask_next(cpu, cpu_possible_mask), ncpu++) >> + ; > > That is max_t(unsigned, cpumask_last(cpu_possible_mask), symnum) I think it should be: - cpu < num_possible_cpus() && ncpu < symnum; + ncpu < symnum; Alex? > > Rest and other kernel patches look good to me > > Acked-by: Andi Kleen > > -Andi >